chigga

and unfortunately they have a lotbof power

THANKS, I'll update as soon as possible.

as another comment said, EPP was against this proposal due to it being not strict enough. They want full control of your chat (e2ee ones too). they were afraid that this would set a precedent for limits for chat control and voted againts

i don't understand, was EPP for or against the extension ? Cause my understanding was that they asked to have a second vote even if the first one already rejected the extension.

I think that Patrick posted it. basically the ones against where the conservatives, both left and right where against (even if there were some people inside those parities who voted to continue the scanning)

EDIT: apparently EPP voted against not because they want to support privacy but because the proposal was not enough invasive. they were afraid that it would have stopped their Chat control 2.0 proposal.

not enough, where is life sentence when needed?

it was about time

actually it didn't passed.

So this war is far from an end huh?

PLEASE

this is the real thing, this is almost certainly unconstitutional.

greedy corps going against law as usual.

hopefully no. but we are still in danger