cristian64

I've been following this rule for about a good decade now. It doesn't apply only to Netflix series.

The are many series to watch; no point in starting to watch one without any guarantee that the series will keep consistent good ratings until the finale.

Unfortunately, once they start chopping fingers, it will not matter how well hidden those codes were.

I will not watch ads. That's the first, unbreakable premise. If the service does not provide videos, I leave the service.

I did mean to reply to your comment. Just trying to say that I don't need 2nd homes to be taxed much more higher that 1st homes if the issue can be fixed without getting to that point. Although it shouldn't be off the table if it's necessary to guarantee people can have access to homes.

It's not unreasonable, but if after taxing 3rd and 4th homes (etc.) to oblivion the issue persists, then also second homes should be taxed high. I truly believe that extreme would not be needed once it's made humanely forbidden to own multiple homes without intention of ever living in them.

Worth adding that it should not be the number of homes what should be taxed, but based on the market value of those properties.

Why would they do that instead of removing the products from the stores?