defaultusername

joined 1 month ago

Yes, but I used the term "insane asylum" specifically due to its history in the US. Trump spent a lot of his campaign ranting about "Hannibal Lector" after all.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can you start a session where your friends can add music to the queue and control it?

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Do they... not know what reverse engineering means?

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Now if only Trumpism would have shut down extremist right wing idiology globally.

I mean, it's not wrong, especially when you consider the slow destruction of the education system.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago (5 children)

And also after Trump just the other day decided to unban insane asylums.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Most people have been trained from a young age to value convenience over basically everything else. People also don't like to step out of their comfort zone, and not having social media is seen by some as a social taboo and as isolationary by some.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Just like how the Democratic Republic of Korea is a democratic republic.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The Democratic politicians won't ever realize that because they're paid not to realize that.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

FDR won 4 consecutive elections not because he had "good messaging", but because he actually delivered for the people. Republicans had to instill term limits because they didn't want that happening again.

You think he would have won even a second term if he didn't get the US out of the Great Depression with his policies? WWII economy also played a part here, but in modern times, the US has been in perpetual war with several different countries, and the only people getting rich off that are the wealthy few, again, due to policy.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Because Democratic politicians don't believe in anything other than protecting their wealthy donors. Neoliberalism is a cancer, and progressivism/socialism is the way to defeat it. The neoliberals will do anything in their power to protect their wealthy donors, even if that means letting Republicans win, because they would rather see a Republican win than a socialist gain any sort of power.

Hell, they even fight against very mild social democratic politicians like Bernie Sanders.

They'll switch to a 128 bit integer, completely breaking backwards compatibility.

view more: ‹ prev next ›