drkt_

alt source? catbox won't load for me and many others.

At that point just get a GSM router

It is immature and if you go around showing it to girls expecting a date you'll be disappointed.

Do it because it's funny, not because you could use it as an ice-breaker (you can't). If you really want to impress girls, doing it and not giving a fuck what your sister thinks is more likely the impress someone, girl or not- but it's not an ice-breaker.

Change swappiness to 10 and ensure that you don't have anything dynamically adjusting it.

~~American comment~~

This came off kinda rude, I didn't mean for it to be. I'm gonna leave it in the interest of transparency though

Stop making good the enemy of perfect!

@futatorius@lemm.ee also replying to you

I think there's been a semantic misunderstanding -

I'm saying that people are going to be stupid and you should design an intersection that accounts for it. I don't think that's 'designing away stupid' because the stupid is still present. It has merely been limited or entirely contained, but I don't want to have a semantic argument. Just understand that we agree, and the book I reference says almost exactly what you both said.

You can't design away stupid, but if this is a regular problem then the intersection is designed stupid and you need to design a better one.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/201978334-killed-by-a-traffic-engineer

.

Reading comprehension and organized harassment is such a problem for your community that the entire rest of the fediverse knows and jokes about it. I can appreciate that you might not see most of that because most instances defederate from yours and most users block you after the first interaction.

It's totally normal and organic that entire groups of tankies show up at the same time to dunk on low-interaction comments in low-interaction posts, often several replies deep in a thread that nobody's reading anymore, and it's always the most meaningless shit where they clearly didn't read the post and formed a cohesive rebuttal to any points but just spew the first vaguely relevant zinger they find in the text file of one-line zingers they seem to share amongst each other.

Why is it that when I say something controversial in a normal conversation, that doesn't happen? It only happens when I say something mean or, god forbid, factual, in a conversation with an .ml user.

I didn't say conspiracy