Disagree as much as you want, but assuming you're a user, will you keep using it? This isn't a whoopsie, or unexpected. As you pointed out, it will happen again. And it was always the safe, profitable choice for them - they're a for-profit business beholden to VC money, not a political organisation or community project like Mastodon/Pleroma/etc.
It's far easier to make that decision before they gain critical mass like twitter and reddit did.
My naive guess is that if the Turkish government ban access to BlueSky for not complying, that cuts into user count and therefore profitability.
Just to be clear, I am not an M–L, I'm explaining their position because it's important to understand when it comes to geopol.
Also, right now US is not the country that’s launching drones to blow up the civilian houses in the city I live in
That's absolutely true. And on the other hand, the US are also launching drones to blow up civilian houses in other countries, so you will find plenty of people online who are more against the US, just like you rightfully have good reason to want Russia to fall. Ukraine is the theatre of a proxy war between NATO and Russia, and it's a fucking tragedy. The M–L position is that, being a proxy war, the US prolonged it for their own benefit (it's not their soldiers and citizens being attacked) until they finally threw Ukraine away and negotiated terms with the enemy. Normally that step happens diplomatically behind doors when they do it to other countries.
Just like I said, "critical support". They're clear that it's a capitalist "dictatorship of the owning class" (like other liberal-democracies) and that they're critical of their domestic policies. If NATO were no longer as powerful as it is now, then they'd move on to calling for the Russian Federation's fall, but it's clear which of the two is a more imminent threat to countries around the globe. It's like voting for Democrats over Republicans in the US election – they've both proven themselves to be terrible but voting for the lesser evil might be pragmatically effective, and voting third party or boycotting is debatably an idealistic waste of effort.
As someone else mentioned, this is a campist approach to geopolitics.
the US
I wouldn't limit "the imperial core" to the US, but basically, yes.
This recent thread is pretty insightful on lemmygrad.ml's position. Their own users repeatedly emphasize that they are critical of the RF, which shouldn't be a surprise given that it's a capitalist country with plenty of reactionary domestic policies. (OP didn't get banned)
I don't think it's fair to categorize it as accelerationist, although definitely campism and critical support (that is, taking a side while remaining critical of it) - like you said, they know and despair that Russia is no longer socialist, they only side with the RF in this conflict as a 'lesser evil' than the dominant NATO camp. We saw the US prolong the proxy war (it's not their soldiers dying) until the they openly threw Ukraine away and negotiated terms with the RF when the war seemed no longer useful (this part usually happens more diplomatically and privately in a proxy war, but it usually happens).
If you want to argue with someone in good faith you should try to understand their position first, otherwise they will just see you as a reactionary and dismiss what you say.
Absolutely. The .ml instances are stricter than most and don't cater to anyone they perceive as ignorant and parroting propaganda in bad faith. From their point of view, it's just as simple as how most instances would ban conservatives coming in and starting bigoted, ignorant oft-debunked Fox News arguments about racism and transphobia. Why bother platforming it?
Well, if this is some attempt at a virgin sacrifice, I don't think they're doing it right.