freedomPusher

joined 4 years ago
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz to c/isitdown@infosec.pub
 

I’m just noticing this instance for the first time. Judging by the hostname, it’s a node that’s devoted to #XMPP chatter. But I cannot reach it. Getting timeouts from Tor. This could mean that they are down, or it could be that they block Tor in the rudest possible way (dropping packets).

To me, it’s a ghost node because I can reach a tiny cache of posts from !infosec@community.xmpp.net locally:

https://sopuli.xyz/c/infosec@community.xmpp.net

cc: @wintermute@feddit.de

 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/13155149

other people’s iPhones more intrusive than other people’s droids


According to the linked research, all iPhones are spying on everyone within Wi-Fi range. If your phone of any kind is squawking wi-fi, all in-range iPhones are grabbing various bits of data like your MAC address and the SSIDs your phone normally looks for (e.g. your home SSID) and reports that back to Apple along with time and location data. The same study could not say the same for Google. So other people’s iPhones are more of a privacy intrusion to you than other people’s droids.

your own iPhone is less intrusive than your own droid when navigating


However, another study shows an inversion between Apple and Google when it comes to what you own and use for navigation. If you use an iPhone for navigation, the iPhone will only send one or two BSSIDs near you to Apple’s server, and the server then floods you with detailed information about other possible BSSIDs around you and their position, so your own device computes your precise location, not Apple’s servers.

Whereas if you navigate using Google’s location services, your device feeds everything to Google and Google’s server does all the work, computes your precise location, and tells you. This is of course more intrusive because Google learns your precise location and time, and (IMO) is likely interested in whatever shop you might be in.

These two studies actually seem superficially contradictory. But there is a difference between ratting out other portable devices and reporting stationary devices.

free-world proponents might be able to exploit Apple for better nav


In any case, the take-away for people living in the free world: forget about using Google Location Services to improve your navigation if you do not want to feed Google your precise location. OTOH, there seems to at least be a theoretical possibility for people not pawned by tech giants to use Apple’s API to get better-than-GPS navigation. Though I suspect it would mean many people would have to share someone’s sacrificial Apple account or get burner accounts.

I’m always on the look out for ways to improve my shitty navigation on a deGoogled phone that’s limited to a slow energy hungry GPS receiver -- without feeding the baddies.

 

Nano Garden was a node for the Nano cryptocurrency. There is was a “cashless society” community which is now a ghost community:

https://sopuli.xyz/c/cashless_society@nano.garden

I would normally say refugees should move to !cash@slrpnk.net, but it looks like there aren’t many refugees. It always was relatively dead. Which is a shame. There needs to be more people talking about the consequences of #forcedBanking.

 

It was a Lemmy service that centered on law. Now it gives a 404.

The threadiverse is starving for small decentralized nodes with a theme focus. There are far too many general purpose nodes. It’s a shame the law node is gone. There is nothing to replace it.

 

No idea how long it has been down.. just noticed the escapebigtech server has been nonresponsive all day. (Could be tor-hostility as I did not test further, but I doubt it)

 

The immersion style of teaching a language in the purest sense involves refusing to use other languages to aid in teaching the target language. So if you take a French class in France, you might not hear a word of English. Whereas if you take a French class in the US, some teachers will speak English at least in the first few stages.

I find the immersion approach extremely slow and error prone. E.g. if the teacher holds up an image of a red firefighter hat and speaks French, you might not know if she is saying “hard hat”, “red”, or “fire fighter”. You have to guess and if your guess is wrong it feeds into negative training.

There is an audio tape where a Brit teaches French. He said for the most part English words ending in “…tion”, “…ly”, “…ize”, “…ise”, etc are also French words. There are exceptions of course but in just one sentence of English I instantly learned hundreds of French words trivially.

Not sure how thoroughly this has been studied but I suspect immersion language teaching works better on quite young (highly neuroplastic) brains. As an adult it’s very frustrating.

A professor once told me: you don’t need school to learn. You can learn anything by teaching yourself by reading and experiencing the knowledge. But what school does for you is accelerates the learning by structuring it for fast consumption in an organized way. I agree. And I think that the most accelerated way to learn French is to use existing knowledge of English as a tool. Whereas learning by immersion is comparable to learning by experience (the hard way is slow!).

So my ultimate question is whether this as been studied on adults. Does an adult group reach fluency quicker or slower if they learn by immersion? A lot of people say immersion is more effective, but it always seems like this guidance is blind. They never say or imply it’s supported by research. It seems like an indoctrination that people just accept. Different brains are different. An adult who only knows one language will probably be more hindered by immersion because their brain perhaps relies more heavily on associative memory (making connections with existing language knowledge).

 

3 ATM machines in Lille would not produce a note bigger than €50. Is that a nationwide limit or did I just choose the wrong ATMs? I tried a couple indoor ATMs. Since indoor machines are more secure some banks are more generous with denominations and quantity, but it did not seem to make a difference.

I also noticed there was no balance inquiry option. Is that also a nationwide limitation or does it depend on the bank?

(fr) 3 distributeurs automatiques à Lille ne produiraient pas un billet supérieur à 50 €. S'agit-il d'une limite nationale ou ai-je simplement choisi les mauvais distributeurs automatiques ? J'ai essayé quelques guichets automatiques intérieurs. Étant donné que les machines intérieures sont plus sécurisées, certaines banques sont plus généreuses en dénominations et en quantité, mais cela ne semble pas faire de différence.

J'ai également remarqué qu'il n'y avait pas d'option de demande de solde. Est-ce également une limitation nationale ou cela dépend-il de la banque ?

UPDATE

I took some surveys and got all different answers.

  • banker 1: “I think there are a few ATMs in France that have notes bigger than €50 but they are quite rare / hard to find because people simply do not want bigger notes”
  • banker 2: “Maybe other banks but certainly none of our ATMs will have anything bigger than €50”
  • banker 3: “No banks France have anything bigger than €50; I do not know why”
  • banker 4: “No banks France have anything bigger than €50 because no shops will accept notes bigger than €50”
  • bartender: “If your bank card was issued by the same bank that owns the ATM, you will have the option to get bigger notes”

I’m annoyed by the lack of transparency. Bankers and the public should know the answer to that. Seems like secrecy is a #warOnCash tactic. Big notes are important if someone wants to clear out their account so it seems they are trying to prevent a run on the banks.

The bartender also made some interesting points about cash:

  • All shops in France are legally obligated to accept cash and they are not obligated to accept electronic payment. But some shops break that law.
  • Buses do not (or cannot) accept cash because it slows down movement but you can always buy a ticket from a machine using cash.