head_socj

joined 1 month ago
[–] head_socj@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

Actually a better idea is just dumping 2-3 cups of sugar in the gas tank. Will muck up the fuel injection system and put it out of commission pronto.

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

Oh, right; like empathy. /s

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah no shit but in other countries you don't have insurance companies and a laundry list of middlemen skimming half the revenue from your payments before a doctor even sees you.

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago

Lol yeah the choice here is be broke or die

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So close to being gay (and happy) yet too scared to admit to themselves.

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

Well I suppose the future will prove one of us wrong

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So veganism isn't related to or affected by agriculture? The plight of farmworkers worldwide is invalid because it's not as traumatic as slaughterhouse workers? You keep trying to frame my argument as anti-veganism, but it's really not. At this point I can only consider that I've triggered you in some ridiculous way that has nothing to do with anything we're talking about

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean throwing up a study about how vegans in the UK produce less greenhouse gas emissions than high-meat eaters only proves that veganism is better at producing less pollution. I never argued that it's not.

But the study you referenced doesn't account for worker exploitation, inequity in food distribution, or trade asymmetries. I think plant-based diets are fine, but many vegan products occupy industries that still perpetuate monocropping and resource-intensive production lines that produce massive profits for executives while leaving farmers with the short end of the stick.

I don't have a bone to pick with vegans, I just think being vegan is a stop along the way to a healthy planet, not the destination. I'm striving to be as nuanced as I can when I offer my critique, which is essentially we need to start discussing why slaughtering animals is morally bad but exploiting workers and agriculture in third world countries isn't. Having a healthy planet and lifting people out of poverty shouldn't be mutually exclusive goals.

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah still condescending. Whatevs

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

To be fair you haven't even offered anything I can respond to; you're just flailing.

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Good luck with life.

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't see a need to be passive aggressive just because a stranger doesn't agree with you. More the point: it's only ignorant if you think you we live in a vacuum

view more: next ›