incompetent

joined 11 months ago
[–] incompetent@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago

User @brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com explained the differences pretty well in this comment.

[–] incompetent@programming.dev 7 points 3 weeks ago

"I have read and agree to the Terms" is the biggest lie on the web. Together, we can fix that.

https://tosdr.org/en

[–] incompetent@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Does Bernie Sanders come close, in your opinion?

[–] incompetent@programming.dev 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Your AI generated summary, again, lacks evidence. I asked for a site, or a source where what you claim credibly happened, not just repeating the same myths in a circular series of arguments.

I used no AI. Had you actually paid attention you'd see that I cited my source in the first link. The summary I posted it a direct quote from that source. Just because you don't like what you read that doesn't automatically make it AI slop.

I don't feel like refuting any of your other, unsourced assumptions. Good luck with your beloved Windows 7.

[–] incompetent@programming.dev 10 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's called a Drive-by Compromise:

Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing. Multiple ways of delivering exploit code to a browser exist (i.e., Drive-by Target), including:

  • A legitimate website is compromised, allowing adversaries to inject malicious code

  • Script files served to a legitimate website from a publicly writeable cloud storage bucket are modified by an adversary

  • Malicious ads are paid for and served through legitimate ad providers (i.e., Malvertising)

  • Built-in web application interfaces that allow user-controllable content are leveraged for the insertion of malicious scripts or iFrames (e.g., cross-site scripting)

Browser push notifications may also be abused by adversaries and leveraged for malicious code injection via User Execution. By clicking "allow" on browser push notifications, users may be granting a website permission to run JavaScript code on their browser.

It's not Hollywood fantasy, as you claim. It is a well documented attack vector.

[–] incompetent@programming.dev 66 points 3 weeks ago

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

I agree.

[–] incompetent@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks again. When I come across a word I don't know I like to look it up to learn it. That one has been bugging me for a while.

[–] incompetent@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why? The porn thing?

[–] incompetent@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like something Grok would say.

[–] incompetent@programming.dev 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] incompetent@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sorry for the off-topic question but I'm curious. I have seen people say "kagis" in a comment a few times in the past and I tried looking it up to see what it means but found irrelevant results. What does it mean in this context? Thanks in advance!

view more: ‹ prev next ›