itistime

Interviewer: Margaret Atwood, what are your thoughts on the trend in the US?

Atwood: I’m Canadian

Oh, they do trickle down on ya! Not with what want ya though

I bet those sales douches are happy with the bonuses they will get.

I don’t like sales dudes.

freedom to insult others

Sure, why not?

smear their names

Libel is not legal in the US.

This is brilliant

Dylan, Dylan, Dylan

How is your behavior any different than the multitude in power and authority who turned a blind eye? Have you considered the life of those he abused? Have you considered the moral battle that is happening?

The moment you begin to mean more to me than he does, then we’ll talk.

Decency and a will against abject evil should be all that it takes to do the right thing. You don’t want to leak here? Fine. ProPublica.

Naming him would do no good.

That is not true. There is no accountability if people keep protecting them. Leak his name. It will help current investigators. It will help future prosecutors. If you don’t do it here or elsewhere, then YOU are not better than him.

It would work out to be a bit of mutually assured murder of their families.

Thugs A and B are never allowed to know each other.

If thug A decides to kill oligarch A, and then travel a long distance to aid thug B in killing oligarch B, then they could likely fail, because oligarchs A & B worked out a means to communicate their proof of life to each other. Many ways to do that, including dedicated messengers. If oligarch B hasn’t received a timely proof of life, then they murder thug A’s family and tell thug B that their family is in danger from outsiders overtaking bunker A. Thug B will likely travel to bunker A.

The thugs would have to collude. A major goal of the oligarchs will be placing many obstacles against collusion.

their families all held hostage in the bunker as well

Now, someone is starting to think like evil.

Better yet would be some cooperation between remote bunkers, where family for workers of bunker A are held far away in bunker B, and vice versa.

What??? That makes no sense.

You’ve not been ridden before?

He would just need placed prone, and the poor victim forced atop.

It’s weird how you won’t concede something so obviously true.