lemonhead2

joined 3 months ago
[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

the alternatives to gimp aren't great either... I tried krita and went back to gimp

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 26 points 10 hours ago (18 children)

wait, was she a trump supporter?

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

not doing something the billionaires find annoying will also pretty much guarantee you don't get surveilled..

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (8 children)

people like this are why I think everyone should take a small intelligence test before voting

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I used to feel the same way. I have nothing private on my website. i didn't need https

but then with just http some isp' can inject content into your http pages. comcast routinely used to do this. idk of they still do

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

women are physically weaker on average. there was a time when physical strength was hugely important

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago (21 children)

she said he's broken all but two of the commandments. which two hasn't he broken? I don't know all the commandments... 🙃

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

is this real? did trump really post this

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago

i need to rewatch that movie reminding myself of the parallels between ants and wage workers

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

discord now has ads btw. the ads are gonna become more annoying as we go along

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

donated. thank you for hosting

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

a lot of this is brainwashing by the rich and powerful. they need the poor motivated and working to make the rich even richer. paying the workers scraps and telling them to work hard is more profitable than paying them a fair wage.

when paid properly the workers would be happier and more productive. but that's still less profitable for the ones at the top

 

source unknown (sorry)

 
  • Includes 206 bones (ligaments and cartilage not included).
  • If you also buy the muscular system the two will work together so that you can move.

(Science assignment my daughter did in 6th grade. sorry for the bad shadows in there photo)

 

Today, the DOJ plopped a proposed regulation on the Federal Register that would authorize Attorney General Pam Bondi to block any state bar ethics investigation into current and former DOJ lawyers while the department conducts its own internal review. If state bar authorities refuse the AG’s “request” to pause an investigation, the rule allows the DOJ to “take appropriate action to prevent the bar disciplinary authorities from interfering with the Attorney General’s review of the allegations.”

Video explaining it: youtube

Call to action (from the video description): Today Pam Bondi announced a new rule that would stop state bar associations from investigating misconduct by lawyers. We can work to stop this rule by writing comments stating our objections. To make your voice heard, go to the comment portal here: https://www.regulations.gov/document/DOJ-OAG-2026-0001-0001 and click the “comment” box.

SAMPLE OBJECTION you can model and adapt: I am a concerned citizen who cares deeply about preserving the rule of law and upholding the integrity of our justice system. I strongly oppose this new rule because it will diminish accountability for misconduct by government lawyers. I believe that lawyers representing the United States should be held to the highest standards of ethics and professionalism. They must be subject to oversight by independent authorities like state bar associations; the Justice Department cannot be trusted to police itself. This proposed rule would allow the Attorney General to interfere with independent state bar investigations. That will greatly harm the integrity of our justice system and allow misconduct to go unpunished.

46
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by lemonhead2@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
 

Academics produce papers and give it to Elsevier for free. Academics referee the paper for free. Elsevier sells the papers back to Academics. This has been their business model for some time... but now they've found another way to monetize you. They sell your data.

view more: next ›