libre_warrior

joined 4 years ago
[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Cryptocurrencies are a waste of resources and gives might to those with computing force, that is the mighty.

There is no reason to inbosom it.

Let's rather effort towards moneyless societies.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

All Cryptocurrencies Are Bad

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Yes, that's a trap. When you make the thing you love into a job. You blur the lines of whether it still is meaningful or something you do because you love it. You are no longer guided the meaningful, but whether your bloodgivers finds it valuable. In smaller and larger ways your path is steered away from the meaningful.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Superiority complex in the comments.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Tech is made to make us feel stupid, so you are not alone in feeling that.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

If the symbolism doesnt matter that much to you, you could use the letter "v" as the icon.

Here I found a black on white drawing of a handsign for the letter v under Creative Commons by Erik Bolstad, Store Norske Leksikon.

handsign for the letter v

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Imperialist outlet Independent privacy washing surveillance messager Meta Whatsapp. They are platforming might - that is Meta Whatsapp spokesperson - instead of privacy focused organizations such as Electronic Frontier Foundation. Painting Iran as paranoid after litterally being attacked by zioni supremacist ruledom.

Now let's be clear. Morality police is bad. Women Life Freedom. They are suppressing humanity. But this work is made to embolden Israel and western might.

Side with folks instead. We need to enblossom the folks at ground so that they can become independent of might.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

Why are we promoting trash?

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Dismantle all walldoms!

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

The post is about anarchism, so I dont see why it doesnt fit under this community.

1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by libre_warrior@lemmy.ml to c/anarchism@lemmy.ml
 

// using anglish https://wordbook.anglish.org/

// using my own words, look at wordbook below

I'm very gleeded by the tongue. It shapes how we view our world. It chooses how we frame everything from the everyday to the All That Is.

As an withermighter (or anarchist if you will), this makes fullstanding sense to me, but it seems like this samspeech is barely touched by anarchists.

Let's not misunderstand, I am not saying the tongue is more weighty than other forthgangs. We need to dream, to do deeds, to wither might, and to folkweight.

But we are not going to make a change, to loken Gaja, if we are using the tongue of our fiends. Because this is what has happened with our tongues over the thousands of years of might.

Might has shaped our tongues so that we don't think clearly. We think of the industrial machine as the Tree of the Machine that can - and has to - grow unendingly to provide for an unendingly greatening folkrime. We speak of the mighty as newthinkers, jobmakers, mankindloving, dreamers, investors and wise. When the Tree of the Machine begrips freeland, it is seen as a loke for the holy tree.

Herethrough when we use a word, we strengthen the framework of that word. For deem, the word civilization was made in the aroundings of trying to overlingen overgrippers. To make it seem like the overgrippers are rightwised to step on others. To miscare for the mansworth of those being stepped upon.

We need to feel our words and bespeak whether they help us, or misguides us. Are our words meltful? Do they match their retching and metings? Does the word meting match with how our world works?

By greatening meltfulness, our thanks will spread more easily. By having our metings match our retching, we will understand our words. By matching our words with the world, our thanks will guide us unto a good path.

wordbook:

  • folkrime :: The muchness of a folk.
  • tind :: Something that glows a force of life.
  • meting :: The weight of a word, for deem the word horse is weighted with all our undergoings with that which we have been told is a horse. overgrippers :: When somebody wield over a folk without their thave.
  • overlingen :: To make somebody seem better than others.
  • retching :: The meaning of a word.
  • samspeech :: Speaking together.
  • thank :: To think, but in the past.
  • thave: When two players agree upon something.
  • tongue :: The forthgang of how folks speak with eachother.
  • freeland :: Where the deers roam, the fishes swim, the trees dances in the wind, the bumblebees taste uncountful amounts of flowers.
  • withermighter :: Somebody who stands against might, since all might is bad. --
[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Id be against advertising on peertube, advertising is to mighten overproducers to overgrip peertube inhold. Inhold should rather be made on the grounds of the meaningful, and design should eyen how to forward the meaningful.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Using it for a pair years. Very satisfied. Sometimes there are bugs, but they are nothing big. It doesn't feel like I'm prioritizing away any features.

I don't know how it is different from android OS though.

 

We misunderstand the strengths of the commons of tools and not knowing how we play to our strengths.

Free software today is usually promoted through big brands like libreoffice, gimp or firefox. These are successful in terms of branding, but is not playing to the strengths of the commons. In the commons, we move away from the walled and towards the interconnected.

The strenghts doesn't lie in bloated and branded tools, but rather in the small tools that anyone can make if they have some spare time. We need to reframe away from the bloatedness to the caresome. Where the tools are easily made, available by birth and easily tinkerable.

And we need towards the descriptive instead of the branded. Towards letting words dictate tools instead of tools dictating words.

Today operating systems revolves around the branded, bloated and wasteful. The lokening is to move towards operating systems that inbosoms the caresome and descriptive.

 

Freedom is such a vague word, we shouldn’t use this word if we want to be precise about what we mean by it.

When we talk about free software, we point to transparency, studyability, tinkerability and sharability. The openness to allow ourselves to use our tools with freedom.

However, I do not think we should use the term open source. The reason for my distancing of the word source is because the word makes us think about development instead of the end user. Because if we want these kinds of software to appeal to the masses, we the word to emphasize that it is meant for them. Instead, I would use the term open software, open tool or open machine.

1
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by libre_warrior@lemmy.ml to c/fediversefutures@lemmy.ml
 

EDIT: More precise titles.

The way we sort comments on lemmy today is through giving everyone the ability to up and downvote any comment. You upvote comments you want to be more visible and downvote comments you want to have less visibility.

I think ranking comments are great if some opinions contribute more.

Imagine the value of a comment can be determined before voting. Perhaps with a panel of judges. With rankings -10 to 10 where -10 is dangerous misinformation, 0 has no meaningful contribution and 10 is perhaps mindblowingly enlightening or empowering.

Example of lemmy style sorting

Lets say a post is submitted. On the first day, it received the comments with a judges score (user, score):

(monkey, 8), (zebra, -2), (horse, 5), (panda, 3), (rhino, 3).

A post get the most visibility the first day. Therefore, those who post early can get a lot of votes.

However on the second day, one user submitted the comment:

(Flower, 9)

A this point in time the post doesnt have that many voters. And the top comments has increased visibility, so for every vote flower gains, the top comment might have received another. So we end up with the final ranking:

Monkey, horse, panda, flower, rhino, zebra.

So it ends up only ranking similar to panda and rhino even though the score was much higher. There was a mismatch between votes and score.

Solution, the topoligical sort

We should concider moving away from voting on comments individually to voting comparatively. Where you perhaps determine the most valuable comment out of a selection. Then a topological sort can put the best comment on top.

So even if flower is late to the party, their insight is still spread.

 

I'm interested in a complimentary federated service for peertube and similar services. One can subscribe to creators and instances. You can't create independent posts, because it is solely made as a subscription service. However you can comment on creations.

It is intended as a tool to keep track of creators you are interested in, and have a seamless experience with going from one video to the next and be able to post quick comments.

I'm envisioning that this service could be distributed and serverless like Scuttlebutt. That way, there would be no signup process involved. One could then download software/ app for your phone and start adding instances and creators.

To comment, one would perhaps need some verification system, like connecting your app to a user to avoid misuse.

A service like this would act similar to an federated RSS, but with more flexibility.

I believe a service like this would be superior to any subscription solution we have today, that be through RSS, peertube,

I believe this would bring a lot of utility to the fediverse. It would make it far easier to develop new federated projects. And it would be a great gateway into the fediverse. It would make it far easier to interact with content which would make the fediverse look more populated and more exciting.

If you think this is a good idea, say aye in the comments.

 

I have a subscription of Family and Friends on the site tab.digital. This would allow me to add apps to my nextcloud. One of the apps I have been most excited about has been the News app, which can administrate open subscription feeds like RSS. However, I have a couple issues.

First of all, I've been notified that the app is unstable on my Family and Friends subscription from a dialogue box. I don't know if that is due to me having the wrong subscription or whether it has to do with the app itself being unstable.

So far I've ignored that warning, because I can risk the service failing. I'll just have to contact the provider to reset in that case.

I have sent an email to the provider, but I expect an response on monday so It's kind of long to wait.

Does anybody have any experience with News app on Nextcloud or with tab.digital?

view more: next ›