limonfiesta

joined 2 years ago
[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I always chuckle whenever I hear people earnestly recommend Pine Phone, or Librem, to other users as daily drivers.

Tinker? Sure, absolutely. But daily use? lol, no.

I look forward to someday daily driving a purpose built Linux phone, but that day isn't here, yet.

Until then, deal with Graphene, or get an Android that supports pmOS. Just understand the real security implications and risks associated with the later.

Source: someone who actually owns purpose built Linux phones.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

lol. Just lol.

Edit: For those unaware.

"It’s also worth noting that plenty of Purism users have reported that they haven’t received the company’s previous Librem 5 phone, several years after ordering it. That phone first started shipping in 2020, while users report that Purism isn’t honoring refunds for these delayed orders or that the company is dragging its feet in this regard. So if it looks fishy and smells fishy, well, it must be a fish."

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

They were lucky enough to have bought houses during the great recession.

Mystery solved.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They aren't poisoning the data with disinformation.

They're poisoning it with accurate, but irrelevant information.

For example, if a bot is crawling sites relating to computer programming, or weather, this tool might lure the crawler into pages related to animal facts, or human biology.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Add more water to pancake batter, thin it out, and you can absolutely get them that thin and flexible.

Source: I do it all the time with homemade scratch pancake batter, especially if it's been in the fridge for a day.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm confused. Are you saying YOU can't tell the difference, or that their is no technical difference?

Because, anecdotally, I've owned a variety of these devices, and I can absolutely tell the difference. Which sucks, because I bought cheaper devices hoping for reasonable parity of experience. I'm not saying my cheaper devices are bad, just that clearly the Shield TV performs better.

As to the actual specs, there is also clearly a real world difference between the bog standard Amlogic SoC (1/8, 2/8, 2/16), and the Tegra SoC.

It's entirely reasonable to argue that the difference isn't worth the extra cost, fine. But it's dishonest to say there is no appreciable difference.

TBF I haven't used the newer "low cost" Shield with the 2/16 Tegra SoC, so I can't really speak to how it performs relative to something like Chromecast with Google TV.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Fuck me. You might be right, as I haven't actually used the stock launcher since the big ad update years back.

I just remembered my original launcher having a lot of a Nvidia specific integrations, but I guess those could have just been bolted on at the system level.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I said Playstore Certified, and yes, they are mostly the same when you look under the hood, at least for those classes of devices, per generation.

Same, or similar SoC, with 2/8 (sometimes 2/16) specs.

Once you get up to the 4/32 range, you're already looking around the same price (+/-) of a Shield TV.

Also, lol @ citing LTT, for anything. Just because a broken clock is right twice a day, doesn't change the fact that it's broken.

And for the sake of being fair, I didn't even mention the 1/8 boards.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, Google is an inextricably linked to all Google TV issues, but they didn't force Nvidia to ruin the Shield TV'S launcher with ads, and other bloat.

At least, not as far as I know. If you have sources saying otherwise, I'd be happy to take a look.

view more: next ›