meathappening

joined 3 months ago
[–] meathappening@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

It's really the latter, but the laws requiring notification are structured in a way that it's considered a breach because the end result is the same for the individuals affected.

[–] meathappening@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

That's weird. My wife uses an iPhone and it works flawlessly, and I don't think any specific configuration was required.

[–] meathappening@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

Feedme is good but Read You is gorgeous (and we all know that's what matters).

[–] meathappening@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago

This is the correct answer. Never forget that US copyright law originally allowed for a 14 year (renewable for 14 more years) term. Now copyright holders are able to:

  • reach consumers more quickly and easily using the internet
  • market on more fronts (merch didn't exist in 1710)
  • form other business types to better hold/manage IP

So much in the modern world exists to enable copyright holders, but terms are longer than ever. It's insane.

[–] meathappening@lemmy.ml 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That's fair, but OpenAI isn't fighting to reform copyright law for everyone. OpenAI wants you to be subject to the same restrictions you currently face, and them to be exempt. This isn't really an "enemy of my enemy" situation.