mukt

You need to answer my preceding post if the pretense that this is a rational discussion from your side has to continue.

If you are exploring, I'd suggest giving Unexpected Keyboard a try. You might like it even though there is no autocorrect.

Both India and Pakistan took away autonomy from all princely states under their control respective control. I don't see any reason to single out one Princely state.

If you have any logical principle which singles out Kashmir, but not any of the others, please state.

Which particular claim?

It is justified. Another matter that the justification doesn't respect sovereignity of Pakistan - just like Pakistan army doesn't respect its democracy.

Tourists of Pakistan always hear local fairy tales. But they can't tell the real status of Kashmir they have made 'azad' from India, anf then sold to China like a medieval feudal lord from Mohammad's era.

Ah, crazy Indian forces. They either bomb Pakistani forests, or civilians, never terrorist camps that they have intel on.

Perhaps Pakistan would like cooperate when Indian govt investigates it. Civilians, after all. Nothing sensitive?

Just like USA attacked stronghold of Osama Bin Laden which was in a country far far away (can't remember which country), India is just sorting out known terrorist training camps in its neighbourhood.

I suppose it was equally illegal for USA to kill Osama in (can't remember which country).

Your ancestors amputated your largest colony with a fake partition which has been dissolving bit by bit through the decades, and painfully.

No. Not your fault. Go enjoy your cake.

Webpage not accessible

... and lawyers.