It’s the whole premise of The Capture.
ohulancutash
It’s a trade paper, not a fan site. It’s relevant information to the industry it reports on.
Sets are also covered in the local spend figures.
Because the lead actors aren’t part of local spend.
You absolutely shouldn’t do this, but one Japanese operator was caught running a nuclear plant where the only people on the night shift were cleaners, who hadn’t even been told what their radiation badges were. They got a minor fine.
Never was.
Not really. They banned priest marriage so they could stop paying pensions to widows and would inherit all their property, and throughout the Catholic existence they were selling pardons for sins.
Even the establishment of Christianity was a cash grab. They gentrified Jesus because Jews weren’t interested in this particular messiah and it was the gentiles who had the cash at the time.
Israel is the only buyer to be permitted to run its own software.
That’s what I said when I saw Mark there at the inauguration. “My”, I said, “doesn’t he look irrelevant”.
An EU study found that Britain was comparable to the rest of the EU in pricing and punctuality. And, of course, the taxpayer pays the difference anyway.
They still have cheques over there? Last time I saw one here was 15 years ago.
Lead actors would be contracted centrally from LA, while day players and local recurring roles would be NY actors.
They’re basically talking about monies paid to NY contractors for construction, stages, crew, locations, catering, accommodation, equipment rental and materials.
When you are accepted into the production credit scheme you must keep an accounting of monies spent in that jurisdiction. That’s where this figure comes from, it doesn’t represent the total budget of the production which will spend elsewhere in LA and other places for post production- some of which is covered by other credit schemes in other locations, similarly accounted for.