ohwhatfollyisman

fuck me var is going to suck some worser balls, isn't it?

maybe that's a requirement only for tarzan?

i have a drawer which would otherwise have been empty, but thankfully i have a nexus 6p, a pixel 2, an lg q6, some lenovo phablet, and a galaxy note 5 to use up that space.

they also do make mighty fine paperweights if one is needed in a pinch.

and now he must seek her out for the left shoe.

california android. was that before or after ice cream sandwich?

add to that: with just contrasting colours, people would forever be confused about which colour represents the front and which the back.

such a design would just present the same problem again at twice the cost.

it's almost like playing with a full bladder is some sort of disadvantage.

you don't tax the income. you tax luxury expenditure.

if they commission a yacht, they pay 200% tax on that. if they charter a jet, they pay 500% tax on that spend. if they retain a jet, they pay 800% tax on all its expenses from hangar parking to servicing to everything else.

the tax on any car above a guideline value should increase 1% for every 1% increase in value of the car. say, you pay 1% tax for a 1000 dollar car, 50% for a 1500 dollar car, 100% for a 2000 dollar car, 300% for a 4000 dollar car and so on. and not just on the sticker price, but on every service attached to that vehicle (insurance, maintenance, etc.) for its life.

similarly for luxury hotels, clothing, jewellery, watches, golf and ski resorts, and marriages in venice.

never gonna...

it's like a tick-ing time bomb, eh?

i have keepass on only one device. i don't mind looking up individual passwords and typing them in manually when on other devices.

on the device which hosts keepass, the app is hidden and hoops must be jumped to reach it.

i back up the encrypted password database once a month to a cloud service as insurance against me losing that one device.

it's not the most convenient setup but i sleep so much easier for it.

tomorrow's headlines: bbc bars publication of details of cancer treatment.

such information, they say, is deeply offensive to the horrendous disease regardless of how many young, innocent victims it claims.