oxjox

joined 2 years ago
[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Category View introduces a simple way to organize emails by type

It wouldn't be possible for me to overstate how much I dislike this feature. It's one thing I can't stand about Gmail and from what I've observed, iCloud has this now too. I'm wondering if people actually find this more useful than a hindrance. I mean, I have spent days with several email addresses creating my own filters so I get not everyone can do that. But the way this is typically implemented just seems like another spam mailbox that no one's going to check.

I assume they will but if Proton doesn't have a way to disable this, I am out.

Manage newsletter subscriptions

What would actually be cool is a dedicated newsletter app. I use BigNews as an RSS reader and newsletter reader. They give me an email address just for newsletters. It's fantastic.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago

This Mother Jones article really made things more clear.

Trump, a president who rules like a mob boss while claiming vast new powers, is transforming the government into a tool of reward and punishment.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I've owned many iPads. To claim you can't use it without a subscription service is ridiculous. Yes, you need an Apple ID to download apps from the App Store but that doesn't cost anything (just like a Google account).

You're comparing two electronic devices that are ten years apart from each other. Of fucking course the new one is going to be better. If you think a Galaxy tablet is great, you should really try a new iPad.

I mean, you're just coming off sounding like an Apple-hater and someone who hasn't ever actually owned an iPad. Maybe even a bot.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As a major shipping artery, Panama makes far more sense than Greenland. What are you talking about?

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

In a way that he has ulterior motives he's not telling the public, I'd agree with that. It turns out that he's the most politician-y politician.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I don’t know how much weight I put into this piece, given that we’re talking about Trump, but I appreciate the perspective. From my understanding, the US has always had a good relationship with Greenland and could have easily worked with them to increase defenses and security. There could certainly be another objective like mining natural resources or, I dunno, building crypto mining facilities. The whole thing should be offensive to all Americans, especially conservatives.

 

Excerpts:

When the president talks about security in the Arctic, he’s talking about climate change.

Their aim, the vice president said in a video on X, is to check up on Greenland’s security, because unnamed other countries could “use its territories and its waterways to threaten the United States.” And these are real concerns for the United States, rooted in climate change: As polar ice melts away, superpowers are vying for newly open shipping routes in the Arctic Ocean and largely unexplored mineral and fossil-fuel reserves. Arctic warming could pose a direct threat to America’s security interests too: Alaska could have new vulnerabilities to both China and Russia; changes in ocean salinity and temperature might interfere with submarine detection systems; the extremes of climate change, including permafrost thaw in Russia, could drive economic instability, social unrest, and territorial claims.

So far this term, Trump has acted as if climate change does not matter: He has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement, announced plans to reopen the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil and gas drilling, and paused new offshore-wind development and Inflation Reduction Act clean-energy funding. But if the president’s bid for Greenland—or the U.S. military’s quiet cooperation with Canada to boost Arctic defenses—is any indication, the U.S. is weighing its options for a warmer future. “We live in the real world,” Evan Bloom, a global fellow at the Wilson Center’s Polar Institute and former State Department official, told me. “The military and other agencies will continue to take climate change into account, because they have to.” When he hears Trump talk about Greenland, he hears the president speaking about the geopolitics of climate change—“whether he’s willing to call it that or not.”

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

I was coerced into it because someone thought they were my illegitimate half-sibling. I was extremely hesitant due to privacy concerns but I succumbed to family pressure. Through the test, we discovered she's more likely to be my cousin. Immediately after, I "deleted" all my info. I guess you can only take their word for it.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

I wish I had half your optimism.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago

While this certainly doesn’t help our already failing primary education system, the department of education mostly works with grants and loans and continued education (GED), ensuring a safe learning environment, aiding those with disabilities, etc. You know, the bare minimum governments should be doing.

0
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by oxjox@lemmy.ml to c/music@lemmy.world
 

I've just been archiving about 75 of my deceased uncle's CD-Rs which, I'm assuming, he had archived from his EMusic account. The labeling of the CDs (ex., 13/08/23) and the order of tracks is completely wacked but I really appreciate that I have "hard copies".

Last year, I gave my 16 year old nephew a classic (refurbed) iPod full of about 10,000 songs. Don't think he really appreciated it (and the months it took me to curate it). Kid was touching the screen and had no idea what a click wheel was.

I'm an avid record (500) and CD (100) collector but I have close to 100,000 tracks in my digital library. This music was acquired in a number of ways but only about a quarter of it was ever paid for by me. I know how to get music for free. I'm sure most of this sub knows too.

I've mostly resorted to buying physical media for the albums I really like and sourcing digital music with abandon for background music, playlists, and iPod playback.

For a wide variety of reasons, I do not use streaming music services. For one, with such a large music collection of my own, I was never listening to it. Two, and more importantly for this post, you can't pass down a subscription service.

I'm just curious, is anyone buying digital music anymore?

Bandcamp is an easy place to pay for music but it's not really mainstream. If you wanted to buy the new Teddy Swims album, where would you buy that? I just pulled this album out as an example because it's in the iTunes Store. Apple has it for $8 but the artist has a 24/44 MP3 for $5.

Where are you buying digital music from and why?

Ooh - and is anyone either buying digital and burning to CD for backup or buying CDs and ripping them for playback? Or are you all too young for CDs over here?

view more: next ›