pantherina

joined 8 months ago
[–] pantherina@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

Because

  1. Centralization
  2. Control
  3. Post history
[–] pantherina@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

Haha btw I love rule 3

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

No not centralization. You can post on whatever instance, and the posts are "symlinked" to the similar communities. Interactions go to the instance post you made. Percectly decentralized.

If a user is blocked, such communities could agree to share the blocklist. Otherwise, they could post on a clone community (like aready possible) and their posts would not be linked to the instance where they are blocked

I dont see the issue

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Community admins would decide to link their communities. Another commenter shared a blog post about this very big issue

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Interesting!

I think it would make most sense to join instances into a group, so when a user posts in one community, the community clones the post to the others.

Crossposting doesnt even work, but there should be a post type so that all content is read-only and the interactions (likes, comments) are redirected to the original post

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] pantherina@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I dont think this is a good model. Communities should be linked at least, and have stuff like "only post here" optionally (if there is any sense in that)

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Stuff is getting seriously duplicated here...

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

Seit es sie gibt mWn

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Kannst sie deaktivieren... und ich wundere mich warum die so ein Feature deaktivierbar gemacht haben

 

Whatsapp is privacy invasive, and we likely know that even when using E2EE, this is possible due to metadata tracking.

An easy way to avoid one creepy thing, contact scanning and the creation of "who knows whom" social nets, is to not grant apps permission to your contacts!

But this is not easy, as apps often enforce this, just as they do with

  • embedded cameras instead of using the system camera
  • embedded galleries instead of the 2 available portals (but Google will soon forbid that)
  • asking for unneeded permissions

Only GrapheneOS also allows blocking these permissions

  • sensors
  • internet
  • loading code from memory i.e. from the internet (why would they do that? Is there something they want to hide?)
  • debugging their own code to spy on the system behavior

But this app can help everyone on any Android to at least fix this :)

0
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by pantherina@feddit.org to c/dach@feddit.org
 

Hi, weil Deutschland und so denke ich mal, dass es hier viele Menschen mit kalkigem Wasser gibt.

Mein Geschirr ist crazy. Alles nach 10 oder so Spülmaschinendurchläufen mit ner krassen Kalkschicht überzogen.

so sieht das aus

Ich würde Citronensäure kaufen und die mit reintun? Vllt mal den pH des Wassers checken?

Aber mixt man das dann mit dem Pulver oder tut es so rein?

Als Spülmaschinenpulver verwende ich "Sodasan Maschinen Spülmittel Pulver" aus dem Bioladen. Da steht nix von pH wie auf manchen Waschmitteln.

Update

  • hab nie Salz verwendet, ups. Welches gekauft, den Behälter vollgemacht, passt. Irgendwas mit Ionentauschen
  • hab mal bisschen Essigessenz in die Maschine verteilt. Das nimmt dann beim ersten Durchgang vielleicht ein bisschen Kalk weg.
  • Der erste Durchgang ist aber sehr langsam, wie ich in diesem Video von "Technology Connections" gelernt habe (danke an den Kommentierer für den Tipp!)
  • also Essig vllt nochmal in der Mitte reintun mit dem Pause-Weitermachen Modus
view more: next ›