porl

Yes, I saw them afterwards. Nice work! I can do the cross eyed ones with some effort but the wall eyed ones (I didn't know the name before) I could see instantly and with far better focus.

These ones require crossing your eyes, whereas the other type you relax them (like looking further away).

I find the other type way easier and struggle with cross eye ones. For these images you could swap the left and right portions to get it working the other way.

I'm in the same boat as you. Loved it for what it was on my old Pentium 2 (no internet). Learner a lot and had a blast. Not a daily driver now I have time constraints and binary packages lose what made it special. Happy on Arch for personal stuff and Debian for mission critical stuff.

But that's almost never how a system is configured. The entire point is that bash, zsh, fish etc. can make use of those utilities. You don't need bash trying to reinvent everything. You don't want that. That's why changing shells is generally painless and a strength, not a weakness.

Oh yes, my moment! 2002, stage 1 off a DVD with no internet connection on a Pentium 2. Accidentally selected everything including open office, Firefox and done other stuff I don't remember then hit emerge world. One week of compiling later it was finally ready for the next input 😂

Linux gamers say Delta Force game is 'not part of our agenda in the future'

Very cute! Good on you for being responsible too, both for the wildlife's sake and theirs 😊

Nor do I, and I use both Arch and Debian exclusively.

Yeah, I'm not a fan of flatpak for my usage, but this isn't a great argument against it.

I'd rather someone "only" release on flatpak if that's the simplest way they can support Linux compared to no support at all.

Sshfs isn't the same as smbfs if that's what you're thinking. It has nothing to do with how windows does files.