pumpkin_spice

Only 50%

Do people need a reminder of who owns this company?

You don't like the 'pedestrian mower' trucks, where the driver can't see anything that's less than 30 feet in front of them? Weird. /s

I don't want AI-generated assets in games at the expense of past, present, and future artists -- artists that created all the source material in the first place and had it pirated by corporations who had enough money to ignore all existing IP law globally.

If Tim Sweeney is fine with pirating other's art, he should be cool with people pirating his games.

when you make it clear to be honest

It has no idea what honesty is. It has no idea what bias is.

It is fancy auto-complete. And it's wrong so often (like 40% of the time) that it should not be used to seek out factual information that the prompter doesn't already know.

Please remember that this software has not yet been properly audited and could potentially have bugs that compromise your passwords.

That said, it looks attractive and promising.

Feminism has a place, but it is explicitly about promoting women's interests -- something which if allowed to continue unchecked, leads to significant disadvantages for men.

I think that's a dangerous belief. I don't see the difference between saying that and saying "Equality for black people has a place, but it is explicitly about promoting black interests -- something which if left allowed to continue unchecked, leads to significant disadvantages to whites."

Some people argue that intent shouldn't be considered when sentencing people for their crimes.

I believe intent impacts a perpetrator's potential rehabilitation (something a lot of countries put very little effort into when keeping people incarcerated) and should therefore affect sentencing.

Casually throwing feminism under the bus -- a movement that focuses on women's issues (to the overall societal benefit of everyone) -- for focusing on women's issues?

Huh. Is this socially acceptable now? I thought we were better than this.

This depends on the country/state, the speed limit of the road, and possibly other local laws.

Broadly speaking, in the US on roads with speed limits at or above 55mph: the laws for many states require keeping right except to pass. [Generally] On roads under 55mph: there is no such rule but it's not uncommon for people to think there is, probably due to confusion with the 55+ law, or perhaps there's a different state or local law where they live.

99.9% of people don't look up differing traffic laws before driving through multiple states, which is why most differences are posted with road signage.

EDIT: An obvious exception to the speed limit rule are interstate highways where the speed limit will drop in urban areas but still require to keep right except to pass.

There is a browser extension called Chameleon that will spoof a fair amount of data, but after testing it against one of those fingerprint test sites, it looks like it doesn't/can't spoof everything.

FYI:

https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/doxxing-free-speech-and-first-amendment

In the US, "doxxing" laws are pretty much state-by-state and many may be violating the first amendment.

I didn't see a link to the survey in the article so I found it on the ESA website.

The survey says that 58% of kids want games, but it doesn't seem to specify what percentage of kids want in-game currency?; it simply says that in-game currency is one of the top five video-game related requests, at 43%. But 43% of what? 43% of kids who want games? It's not specific, which would make the news article meaningless.