Highly influential culture? It's a fantasy work, not the cure to cancer. But I'll agree on one thing: corporations are not people; they should be paying to the original creator(s) an efty cut of their profits, from their derivative works.
qyron
So you create whatever work. You have exclusive rights to it, let's say for the sake of the argument, 10 years. During that time you never get any return from your work. But after you can no longer claim your rights, someone, perhaps even a company, stumbles on it - or perhaps they just carefully and patiently waited for it - takes it and capitalizes off it, with you watching and sucking your thumb.
No.
If you, an individual, creates something, you have the right to hold your intelectual property. What should be repelled is how easy it is to exploit artists, of any medium.
Yes. Definitely, yes. And I would buy the condoms.
That is trust. Asking for a safe space, under the roof of their parents, that is sign they trust their parents.
1 - 7
Bater a mortos...
That's the spirit.
But did Germany defeated Brasil in the cup?
It crashed? Go read the telemetry and see what went wrong. Try again.
I'm very critic of the AI craze. Too much hype, money, time,energy and effort put in to get very little from it. And considering most LLMs are trained on stolen intelectual property, that makes it even worse.
LLMs are tools. The people using such tools give it personality, a semblance of agency, see what is not there and start to consider a tool a form of life.
I've seen people pour so much of them into a local model, the bot develops a quasi clone of their personality. But the program is not the person.
Please, stop making bots what they are not.
The simplest way would be for the remaining countries to raise their contribution. And perhaps have a review of the executive salaries.
I grew being told, playfully, that if fried a shoe would taste nice. But no. Too much of a good thing is bad for you.
Not an american but, apparently, still as much confused as you are over the concept.
Large Language Model
To the extent of my understanding, it is a form of slightly more sophisticated bot, as in an automated response algorithm, that is developed over a set of data, in order to have it "understand" the mechanics that make such set cohesive to us humans.
With such background, it is supposed to produce new similar outputs if given new raw data sets to run through the mechanics it acquired during development.
I'm shocked.