roux2scour

joined 2 months ago
[–] roux2scour@jlai.lu 9 points 1 day ago

Fun facts animals are not innocents. Rape, war and baby murder is quite common among them. Im vegan but blindly believe "mother nature" is perfect, peaceful and that animals lives in harmony is blatantly false lol

[–] roux2scour@jlai.lu 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] roux2scour@jlai.lu -3 points 3 days ago

They didn't say food, they said cattle. Meat is as unecessary (except pzarticular health condition) as ai, and pollute more. Opposing ai for environnemental issues but not opposing meat at the same time is kinda contradictory

[–] roux2scour@jlai.lu -3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

As if meat industry where not also driven by stock manipulation, exploitation, destruction of natural habitat, to grow food for developped country consumers, when a lot people still don't have safe access for food.

Meat delicious is based on personal taste. This argument is as valid as "using ai is so fun", so argument rejected

[–] roux2scour@jlai.lu 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We can also go without ai

Yes

Meat can give nutritional value

Palm oil gives nutrients, yet its cultivation pollute. Meat production pollute, and it's consumption can be reduced or replaced.

All I've seen AI do is concentrate wealth to the top 1%tech bros.

I agree. Also consider that meat industry has it's own big evil shareholder that exploit farmers to produce shit for consumers

My whole point is not ai good meat bad.

Its : if your argument against ai is water, energy and pollution (which i agree with, all this datacenter, hardware and energy consumption is nonsense compared to the little scope of where ai is useful), don't oppose it to farming industry, or also fight against intensive meat production, which also involves a john shareholder that destroys the planet

[–] roux2scour@jlai.lu 12 points 3 days ago

Kind of thought that makes the water bill explode

[–] roux2scour@jlai.lu 5 points 6 days ago

Mmmmhm let me put a datacenter and intensive farming here to pump dry all that yummy water

[–] roux2scour@jlai.lu 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks for the node

[–] roux2scour@jlai.lu 1 points 1 week ago

Mmm yes, it technically has the requiremebt for a meme, but isn't there more to a meme than a jpeg and a text ? Like the representation of situations, or things, by the reuse of cultural reference or relatable situation ? Idk, this is is what i think is a meme, here i see a flag with a statement.

I see memes as a way to convey a message, you could maybe have a meme like : *picture of something bad * and a caption saying : "this is ukraine" that convey the statement "ukraine bad"

Note that what i am criticizing here is not the statement, only that the way it conveyed doesn't really fit a meme community imo

[–] roux2scour@jlai.lu 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I know, but here there is no meme Edit: (where's the funny is also a meme)

 

Hello there !

I want to code a little incremental game just for me and some friends, and i started prototyping this in Go (because i know how to use it) but i was thinking that maybe run it in a browser and then use typescript would be better

I have no experience in making games and in javascript, i mostly code for backend and math stuff (my favorite gui is a terminal), and when i need a real gui i use pure html page edited by backend

So i was wondering what would be easier between learning making game in Go, or learning JS/TS for an incremental game (pictures and numbers and text, maybe little animations), and if javascript is still relevant to learn

Thanks !

(Also im a student, so my knowledge of the professional dev world is quite limited, forgive my approximative wording :b)

view more: next ›