this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
300 points (95.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40371 readers
4005 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Do farms collectively use more water than data centres collectively, or does the average farm use more water than the average data centre?

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

why do people hate al so much
(added note: no, i do not piss on the poor. look closer)

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Several reasons.

  1. It's not even AI. It's machine-learning based word predictor. Which gets us to:
  2. It's an absolute example of corporate bullshit made to:
  3. Throw money back and forth in an economy, making it look like it's healthy and booming, while:
  4. Actually tanking the economy,
  5. Making governments sacrifice everything for "AI dominance",
  6. Making management lay off thousands of people under the premise of "automatization", while really it just increases the workload on the rest, all while:
  7. Guzzling tons of water,
  8. Electricity,
  9. Raw materials,
  10. Producing never-before-seen amounts of e-waste,
  11. And leaving residents endangered
  12. All to generate unreliable results
  13. That take tons of human labor to correct
  14. While making others believe the batshit output
  15. And destroying critical and independent thinking.

But yes, you can get some text output or a quick image draft.

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

yup, uhuh, correct, i get the problems with ai, but i still don't get why people hate al
pictured (source):
"weird al" yankovic

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Got it now lol

[–] MrChewy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

That al is just weird, man

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“But surviving uses more resources than generating value for the shareholders. Why are you so selfish?”

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Many farms are owned by corporations not families. Shit, which one is more profitable?

[–] nerv@fedinsfw.app 26 points 1 week ago

We can shut down 90% of datacenters today, suffer a slight inconvinience to our lives and keep living.

We have a farm failure...

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, assuming we are discussing the US where almost all datacenters are being built -

the real thing to realize is not that datacenters are bad (I'm kinda ambivalent), nor that meat is bad, but that poorly written water rights laws are bad. Which is why we grow some of our most water-intensive crops in some of our driest areas and some farmers end up just flooding the desert with water for no reason each year. Restructuring water rights would massively reduce water usage while maintaining food production for the simple reason that then we would stop growing alfalfa in Pheonix

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Nuanced discussion? What are you, a European?

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I keep seeing this argument and it stinks of astroturfing. Probably to portray data centers the same as farms: a resource-intensive but necessary infrastructure. If they wanted to make a good faith argument, it would be good courses, not farms. And I could also go without golf.

Focusing solely on water consumption with these arguments is another red flag. Its easy to find false equivalencies with water, but no other project demands double the power output of the entire state it's in, and not many other projects have as bad a ratio of taxpayer dollars spent to revenue or services generated.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Not all farms are required.

Farmers like to claim they are 'growing your food' while exporting grain and selling corn for ethanol or shipping alfalfa to Saudi Arabia for cattle feed.

They are incredibly unsympathetic.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Blip6338@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is well known that meat based food, especially beef, is a bad use of water ressources vs the nutritional value, probably worse than those ai datacentres for water.

I keep seeing this argument about "meat vs ai" and I think it's just a way to divert the blame and the anti-ai/anti-meat people's attention. We should be doing both, reducing meat/beef consumption and heavily regulating AI datacenters in regards to water and electricity use (regulated in all aspects but that's beyond the scope of this post).

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is zero nutritional value in AI slop

[–] Blip6338@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Yes, but does you eating food generate as much value for the share holders as AI? /s

I agree, but despite all the shit AI waifu generators and the "let's shove it in everything just like we did with blockchain and metaverse" there are legitimate uses (medical, scientific) for AI I think where it has the potential to add value and improve life. AI in the current regulatory, financial, fiscal and moral landscape is a bunch of trouble waiting to happen.

That is why I think it's just rage baiting comparison to say "Your food uses more water than AI". It plays to the "we're replacing you with AI" sentiment.

The more nuanced message is that yes AI datacenters use a lot of water but still a lot less than meat production. I have read a while ago about how with AI they are looking to better target irrigation of crops to reduce the amount of water needed while giving the optimal amount of water for each plants. We'll see if it ends up being a net positive for water consumption vs the water used by the AI to do this...

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

We have a county reservoir and our idiot leaders have made a deal with Amazon to give them 40% of the reservoir capacity. That is a big problem, especially now what we are in a drought in the springtime.

[–] nroth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Some datacenters are still built with cooling towers instead of chillers. I know for a fact Amazon does this. They are slightly cheaper, but massively wasteful. I think we need better laws for the irresponsible companies, but this is not most datacenter companies. If I heard a Google datacenter was going up near me, I would not care. If I heard an Amazon one was, I would be organizing against it as hard as possible.

[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The point you are DELIBERATELY missing is that farms use so much water than AI data centres that the amount data centres use is irrelevant. The water usage claims are so ridiculously overblown and so obviously stupid that it's appalling that people believe them! I have seen people genuinely claim that water used in data centres is destroyed and can never be recovered, or that it's polluted so badly it can never be cleaned. Farms not only use multiple orders of magnitude more water, they also pollute it a hell of a lot more so it's far more difficult to clean and more damaging to the environment. A lot of the claimed numbers come from one person who got gallons and megalitres confused! Just stop spreading this utter nonsense! <haters will not respond with downvotes for calling them out, and more repeatedly debunked nonsense, because they always do, they're really dull as well as annoying!>

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

What powers data centers ?

oh that's right. Power plants.

Power plants that now use 10x the water and produce 10x the pollution than previous levels.

It's not just direct pollution and water use. They use way more water than they report through their demand on local power plants.

And what they can't get from power plants they make up for by burning natural gas or diesel in generators.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I think there is some nuance here. Data centers are being put in cities that cannot support them at the expense of their citizens, this is a corruption problem in my opinion. Data centers could also be much more water conservant than they are, and significantly less polluting and I appreciate the public pressure they are on to improve here. The warm water being released can damage the local ecosystem as well.

I have definitely seen some absurd claims about water usage, but it also isnt totally unconcerning either.

Imo its a pr strategy, water usage is a much more solvable issue than the immense energy usage, and the ai companies would rather actovists attack them for that than for the significant power consumption.

I think the power usage is also going to go down, either because they make ai more efficient, or because they can't make it more efficient and it continues to make no economic sense and mostly goes away. Hopefully that latter scenario leads to a lot of excess green energy to be constructed which would make electrifying the world a little easier. But that is probably wishful thinking.

load more comments
view more: next ›