rursta

joined 2 months ago
[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (4 children)

SSTech requires power to maintain cells.
What we need is liberated schematics Blu-ray burner+ readers, so you can burn even a small cast, and reread until your descendants^50^ make another copy.

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com -3 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

Use SD cards or other external media as carts

Reads like a joke

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

🤣 Gabe now has three more years to make fab

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 2 points 3 days ago

Spill it!🍵💥☕
spill the tea!

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

game dev

Weird way to call an extortionist.

which revolution against who (and how) you mean.

Against Fascists. These “cartels” are funding technofascists.

Valve, as profit seeking extortionists, sides with fascists. Otherwise they would host their extortion services for free.

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com -2 points 1 week ago

They are not anti-porn per se. PP are sexual deviants themselves. But since they have an international monopoly on commerce, they essentially want to have sex slaves for free forever.

People seem to disconnect the Epstein class from the control freaks are one in the same.

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The consequences of exporting cheap labour has come bite’m back huh?

 

Yes, it's not the first time. Yes, I am livid.

 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/technology/p/1131723/roblox-must-face-iowa-consumer-fraud-claims

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1130290/roblox-must-face-iowa-consumer-fraud-claims

Full Ruling.

On May 13, 2026, the Iowa District Court for Polk County issued a ruling allowing Iowa's consumer fraud lawsuit against Roblox Corporation to move forward.

The Court denied Roblox’s attempt to dismiss the core of Iowa's lawsuit and determined that the suit may move forward with its deception claims and certain unfair practice claims. The claims maintain that Roblox purposefully misled parents by misrepresenting both the quantity and the quality of its safety tools.

The Court's decision allows the following arguments made by the Attorney General’s Office to continue:

  • Roblox falsely promised a "safety review of every uploaded image, audio, and video file" to create a false sense of security;
  • Roblox intentionally misrepresented the amount of violent and sexual content on its platform to secure lower age ratings on various app stores;
  • Roblox uses unfair practices, including the default allowance of adult-child communications and the misleading implementation of in-game currency;
  • Roblox lacks sufficient parental controls and fails to warn users about potential harm.

Importantly, the Court rejected Roblox's attempt to evade the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act by arguing its platform is not "merchandise" simply because it is free to play. Noting that Roblox profits by selling user data and in-game currency, the Court ruled that exempting companies like Roblox under their “free” argument would “create a large loophole.”

view more: next ›