stevestevesteve

"Breaks all compatibility [with emby]" was my interpretation of that. Not a huge deal either way but I'd definitely have been calling it 11 with this DB rework myself

And what is "the app" they refer to?

If they don't get praised or promoted instead, yeah.

They're saying they left the voicemail as "on leave" when they were not in reality

Basically, yes. Forces plugins not to use potentially database-engine-specific SQL so that server admins don't have to select their DB based on plugins for jellyfin being compatible.

I kinda agree here. https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/contributing/release-procedure/

Claims to follow semantic versioning, explicitly mentioning changes to plugin APIs as reasoning for a new major version.

Infuriating. Closed documentation for essential hardware is a huge hidden problem with today's tech scene in a way that I doubt anybody but the most interested nerds understand.

Things like datasheets for smartphone chips, network devices, components like the superIO chips mentioned here, they are so frequently hidden to anyone without at least hundreds of thousands to maybe millions of dollars to throw at the manufacturer.

Why's it so hard to run anything but Android on the galaxy s1000000? Because it's nigh impossible to write all the drivers for it with literally zero access to any of the documentation for the hardware.

There are so, so many devs out there that would modify the software or firmware on their devices to make the world a better place (extend the life of IoT devices whose subscription services have vanished. Add features and fix bugs in all those random tiny things around your house. Repair devices whose storage has somehow been corrupted. ) but because a few rich dudes go "hmm I'm not SURE about it but it could maybe reduce our profits somehow eventually", we're stuck in this world of garbage

And you will tell yourself: this is not my beautiful microservice

And the days go by data flowing underground

The description calling it double gnarly hand gestures is tops

I have a benefit of the doubt thing here, not that any billionaire I've heard of deserves it. If I suddenly had a billion dollars, would I donate to an existing charity with an administration I don't know and trust or would I think "hmm I can better choose what happens with this money" and start my own charitable enterprise? Like a bill/Miranda Gates situation.

I know if I had a billion dollars worth of shares of a company I wouldn't necessarily liquidate it all for philanthropy either. Do I hold onto control of these stocks while attempting to guide the company in a more ethical way? Idk. It's an interesting thought

I'm just gonna say implying you'd let someone ~~die~~ burn alive because of their beer preference feels pretty edgy

Shore can sound like "sure"