Yeah, exactly this was actually mentioned on page 555 of the project.
takeda
joined 1 week ago
What LAPD is doing needs to be investigated and they need being punished for it, but as of now Newsom doesn't have control over national guard, trump used an obscure law with very weak justification to get control of it.
This is what this lawsuit is about. To get the control back.
When taking to the press they purposefully used words like "invasion" and "rebellion" to help with justification of invoking this obscure law but it is clear it is not.
The lawsuit is that trump took away Newsome's control of the national guard. This is why he can't "just order" them.
The whole reason for this suit is that trump is taking control of our own national guard through some obscure law so Newsom no longer can control it.
LAPD: LOOK OUT! HE HAS AN ELECTRIC RAZOR! GET HIM!
That's why you will not see a Cybertruck on the road in Europe.
That was the initial reason, now there's also the Nazi reason and the crappy car reason.
Apparently 70-80% of Americans live from paycheck to paycheck.
https://www.forbes.com/advisor/banking/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-statistics-2024/
This is why safety nets are important. In US you can lose your job, not get unemployment and lose access to doctor.
This. Unfortunately we are living in interesting times, and this administration counts on inaction.
These are also meant to be peaceful protests, despite what some night say, historically peaceful protests are more successful than riots.
Will that go with improving public transportation?
view more: next ›
I wasn't aware of state guard, but after looking out up looks like California does have it, although it is about 900 troops so I guess that's why it's is almost as if it wasn't there.