Good. Let's copy that
talkingpumpkin
joined 2 years ago
It feels like 50% of the noise coming from there is flat-out lies, and the other 50% is bullshit instead.
One thing I didn't get: besides the boring "witch hunt" narrative, is her stance that those people didn't do work for RN or that it's fine to use EU-paid personnel for her party in France?
Nah - let's just use English and distort it to annoy UKers and USers(*) instead! :)
(*) those who notice
Will he appear like beetlejuice? Because I could go the The Hague and summon him.
This has nothing to do with war or peace: the whole thing (back from when the phone call was announced last week) is propaganda.
Here's what's worth IMHO:
- Putin can continue his war, but today nobody wrote that he is cold towards the peace process.
- Trump can triumphally (trumpally?) announce that he is making great progress (the best progress) towards "peace".
This one is on me: now that I re-read what I wrote, my wording could have been better/clearer. Sorry about that.
view more: next ›
Back then the problem was rampaging inflation and the (by-the-book) cure was raising interest rates to drive it down.
Nowadays US inflation is not an issue (IIRC it's like 2% or 3%) and tariffs are gonna bring it up in a confused effort to... rebuild a manufacturing industry? (I'm not sure that's the goal - it's hard to say what "great again" means precisely).
In what way would 1979 be a precedent?
Anyway... yes, assuming Trump's goal is to have more manufacturing in the US, tariffs will "work" - the point is how much that's gonna cost (in quality of life, not dollars) and who's gonna pay that price.