I'm not pushing the video, it is there for people who don't want to read. 🤷
Sorry for wasting your two minutes.
Here's some more analysis (also linked on the original post).
My feeling on this is basically with Mozilla potentially running advertising campaigns on their own in Firefox (especially with Google funding possibly drying up), Mozilla felt that they needed to clarify their permission for access to user data.
Still, that doesn't really explain why their initial terms were so over-broad in the first place -- that is why everyone's thinking went straight to AI as soon as they made their initial announcement. They haven't deigned to provide us with an explanation for that - besides telling us that it was due to the CCPA.
Clearly we can't lay all the blame on CCPA, since the rights grant is more limited today than at first introduction - a fact that they readily admit.
Yep, it is also not enabled for Linux, and your distribution might not be using a Mozilla binary anyway.
Right now, it is for new users only. Existing users are going to have to opt in at some later date.
Not really, when you push immature alternatives when ignoring a real choice. Seems more like you are supporting monopoly by ensuring that actual competitors get ignored - along with even smaller vendors.
"Look, don't use LibreOffice instead of Microsoft Word, what you really want is VIM!"
You are saying there is all of this wasted money, but as soon as you are asked for evidence, it is all "I'm not a tax auditor". Defend your claims!
I wrote up what happened (more stuff on my blog).
TL;DR they use aggregated data for ads and they felt like they needed to have an explicit opt-in.
Sorry, you aren't a tax auditor, but you are out here making claims. Try defending them?
view more: next ›
Well - I don't know about them being the same.
The new terms specifically disclaims Mozilla's ownership of your data:
which limits their license to your data to processing it for usage within Firefox or Mozilla services. That is a huge difference. I don't see how they would be able to claim - in a clickwrap agreement - that Mozilla saying that they don't own your data somehow grants Mozilla ownership of your data.
That would be mind boggling.