yukichigai

joined 2 years ago
[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 12 hours ago (7 children)

What's the Venn Diagram of "childhood pyromaniacs" and "Linux users" look like?

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There are plenty of pieces of legislation which allow small businesses to exist which do not involve literally outlawing the competition. Outlawing competition is the sort of regulatory capture that simply should not exist, no matter who benefits from it. Rather, the consumer never benefits from it.

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

small businesses

car dealerships

Bruh, wat?

Yeah, famously "small business", those car dealerships. Right up there with payday loan places, and equally ethical. I can't even.

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Because the laws had to exist for dealerships to exist...

If a business cannot exist without its competition being made illegal then it should not exist. Anti-competitive laws cut both ways.

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

All of the things you've listed there are reasons why dealerships should be allowed to exist. They do not address why manufacturers should not be allowed to sell cars directly to consumers at their own stores. Why would that interfere with the numerous benefits you've suggested that dealerships bring about? Consumers would still be able to choose to purchase their car from a dealership, so why wouldn't they? What could motivate them to go direct to the manufacturer?

Price. It's the price. Manufacturers can offer cars to the consumer at a better price, period. Not only that, they offer it without you having to sit through 2 hours of high-pressure sales and having to double-check every goddamn form you sign to make sure some rate or term duration hasn't "accidentally" been changed to a much higher value.

If dealerships were actually competitive they wouldn't need this law on the books to keep their industry alive.

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Turn it around: how does the enforced dealership model benefit consumers? What value is added by forcing people who want to buy a car to go through another entire group of salespeople adding their own overhead and cost to the equation rather than buying directly from the car manufacturer?

Musk's motivations are anything but pure here, but this is one of those "a stopped clock is right twice a day" moments.

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, he had sense to not ever include any of it from the get-go. Plenty of websites and services suggested he include 88 in his username though.

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

People were also born on the 14th in '88. Any of 'em who have sense don't put that in their username though, at least for very long.

Source: my poor brother.

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately, Sony seems to be really hostile towards allowing most any video player apps on the PS5. They specifically went out of their way to remove DLNA support, and they only just allowed a DLNA-enabled video player on the store 7 months ago... and it's subscription based.

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Especially since the comment is still up and visible.

Now OP's response under that where he posted "Guillotine Elon", that was removed.

EDIT: You can also see this by searching his post history in the sub on pullpush. It's literally the first result.