homelab

I'm looking for options to replace my 2-bay DS214play after 10 years of service and I'm looking for recommendations on what direction to go. My main reason for retiring the NAS is that the OS will see no further updates from Synology, and not much will run on i386 architecture.

I run truenas + docker on a NUC-like HM90 mini-pc which is attached to the NAS for storage and this has been working well for the past ~2 years.

I figure that my options are to either continue using the mini-pc with a form of "dumb" network storage, or replace both systems with something that can handle both workloads.

I've considered building my own SFF PC instead of buying a new NAS (as this would have better upgrade paths), but I haven't been able to find anything with space for HDD which will also fit in the 10" cabinet that both of the above systems currently share.

The new NAS lineup from ugreen (DXP2800/DXP4800) seems like reasonable options, but I'm wondering if there's other options I should consider instead, as these models will only barely fit on the cabinet shelf (250Hx210Wx250D).

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/24140532

Hi everyone!

I’m planning to repurpose an old computer case to house a few Raspberry Pis and could really use some advice.

First, I’m trying to figure out the best way to mount the Raspberry Pis inside the case. Are there any good DIY solutions, or are there premade mounts designed for this kind of project? I want them to be secure but accessible if I need to make changes.

Next, I’d like to power all the Pis centrally. Is there a way to do this efficiently without using separate power adapters for each Pi? I’ve heard of some solutions involving custom power supplies, but I’m not sure where to start.

I’m also thinking about cooling. Would the case’s old fans be sufficient, or should I add heatsinks or other cooling methods to each Pi? I want to make sure everything stays cool, especially if the Pis are running intensive tasks.

Finally, what’s the best way to handle I/O? I’ll need to route HDMI, USB, Ethernet, and other connections out of the case. Are there panel kits or other ways to organize the cables neatly?

I’d love to hear your suggestions or see examples if you’ve done something similar. Thanks in advance for your help!

So I currently have an Asus RT-AC86U that is working fine, but bogging down under load, and also is EOL.

We've got three people and about 15 devices, give or take. Our internet service is currently 300Mb cable.

The AX88U Pro is currently on a very good sale - $220CDN. I figure my options are that, the BE86U at $370, or the BE88U at $500.

Five hundred bucks is out of my justifiable price range. Spending less (a lot!) on the AX router would be nice, but the longevity (and support lifespan) of the BE86 has some appeal too.

I'm also not married to Asus, although they've been consistently excellent for me.

What do y'all think? Any educated guesses on when Asus is going to EOL the AX lineup?

My Jellyfin VM has been failing its nightly backups for some time now (maybe a week or so).

I'm currently backing up to a NAS that has plenty of available space and my other 10 VMs are backing up without issues (though they are a bit smaller than this one).

I am backing up with the ZSTD compression option and the Snapshot mode.

The error is as follows:

INFO: include disk 'scsi0' 'Proxbox-Local:vm-110-disk-0' 128G
INFO: backup mode: snapshot
INFO: ionice priority: 7
INFO: creating vzdump archive '/mnt/pve/Proxbox-NAS/dump/vzdump-qemu-110-2025_01_04-03_29_45.vma.zst'
INFO: started backup task '4be73187-d25c-49cf-aed2-1217fba27f77'
INFO: resuming VM again
INFO:   0% (866.4 MiB of 128.0 GiB) in 3s, read: 288.8 MiB/s, write: 268.0 MiB/s
INFO:   1% (1.5 GiB of 128.0 GiB) in 6s, read: 221.1 MiB/s, write: 216.0 MiB/s
INFO:   2% (2.6 GiB of 128.0 GiB) in 15s, read: 130.5 MiB/s, write: 126.4 MiB/s
INFO:   3% (3.9 GiB of 128.0 GiB) in 25s, read: 128.9 MiB/s, write: 127.5 MiB/s
ERROR: job failed with err -5 - Input/output error
INFO: aborting backup job
INFO: resuming VM again
ERROR: Backup of VM 110 failed - job failed with err -5 - Input/output error
INFO: Failed at 2025-01-04 03:30:17

Anyone experienced this or have any suggestions as to resolving it?

Update: After rebooting the Proxmox node (not just the VM) my backups are now working again. Thanks all for the input!

I am mainly hosting Jellyfin, Nextcloud, and Audiobookself. The files for these services are currently stored on a 2TB HDD and I don't want to lose them in case of a drive failure. I bought two 12TB HDDs because 2TB got tight and I thought I could add redundancy to my system, to prevent data loss due to a drive failure. I thought I would go with a RAID 2 (or another form of RAID?), but everyone on the internet says that RAID is not a backup. I am not sure if I need a backup. I just want to avoid losing my files when the disk fails.
How should I proceed? Should I use RAID2, or rsync the files every, let's say, week? I don't want to have another machine, so I would hook up the rsync target drive to the same machine as the rsync host drive! Rsyncing the files seems to be very cumbersome (also when using a cron job).

Found these guides after having to reprogram my H310 Mini's EEPROM after bricking it with another guide. Can't speak for the other guides, but the PERC H310 MINI guide worked like a charm.

I have a couple rules in place to allow traffic in from specific IPs. Right after these rules I have rules to block everything else, as this firewall is an "allow by default" type.

The problem I'm facing is that when I replace these two ports to match "Any" instead, those machines (matrix server and game server) are unable to perform apt-gets.

I had thought that this should still be allowed, because the egress rules for those two permit outbound traffic to http/s and once that's established it's a "stateful" connection which should allow the traffic to flow back the other way.

What am I doing wrong here, and what is the best way to ensure that traffic only hits these servers from the minimal number of ports.

I'm currently running a Xeon E3-1231v3. It's getting long in the tooth, supports only 32GB RAM, and has only 16 PCIe lanes. I've been butting up against the platform limitations for a couple of years now, and I'm ready to upgrade. I've been running this system for ~10yrs now.

I'm hoping to future proof the next system to also last 8-10 years (where reasonable, considering advancements in tech and improvements in efficiency), but I'm hitting a wall finding CPU candidates.

In a perfect world, I'd like an Intel with iGPU for QuickSync (HWaccel for Frigate/Immich/Jellyfin), AND I would like the 40+ PCIe lanes that the Intel Xeon Scalable CPUs offer.

With only my minimum required PCIe devices I've surpassed the 20 lanes available on desktop CPU's with an iGPU:

• Dual m.2 for Proxmox ZFS mirror (guest storage) - in addition to boot drive (8 lanes)
• LSI HBA (8 lanes)
• Dual SFP+ NIC (8 lanes)

Future proofing:

High priority

• Dedicated GPU (16 lanes)

Low priority

• Additional dual m.2 expansion (8 lanes)
• USB expansions for simplified device passthrough (Coral TPU, Zigbee/Zwave for Home Aassistant, etc) (4 lanes per card) - this assumes the motherboard comes with at least 4-ports
• Coral TPU PCIe (4 lanes?)

Is there anything that fulfills both requirements? Am I being unreasonable or overthinking it? Is there a solution that adds GPU hardware acceleration to the Xeon Silver line without significantly increasing power draw?

Thanks!

I currently have an HP micro server gen 8 with Xpenology with hybrid raid, which works fairly well, but I’m 2 major versions behind. I’m quite happy with it, but I-d like to have an easier upgrade process, and more options. My main use is NAS and a couple of apps. I’d like to have more flexibility, to easily have an arr suite, etc.

Considerdering the hassle of safely upgrading xpenology because of the hybrid raid (4+4+2+2 Gb HDDs) I-d like a setup which I can easily upgrade and modify.

What are my options here? What RAID options are there that easily and efficiently these these disks?

I don-t have the spare money right now to replace the 2Gb disks. Planned in the future.

HyperV has GPU para virtualization

But for qemu,kvm,xen it seems like the best option is to passthrough a GPU to a single VM, unless the GPU supports srvio, which almost all of the retail cards don't.

I head about the woof and gaming on whales project, and they seem to get around this by using only containers for the subdivision.

What methods or options have you used to share a GPU with your VMs?

Motherboard standoff screws are machine screws, so how do I fasten those to wood securely? Can I forgo standoffs entirely since wood isn't conductive?

Also, I'm looking at a spare Radeon RX 5600 right now and I can't find any holes that would make suitable mounting points (RX 7900 XTX is what I actually plan to mount).

I see an L-bracket under the PSU so at least that one looks straightforward at least.

Edit: It looks like that PCIe ribbon comes with a mounting bracket attached. Maybe that's how they did it here.

I'm building my own NAS. I've put together gaming PCs and simple workstations, but this will be my first foray into "the big leagues". At this point, I'm planning to use Unraid because it seems quite beginner friendly. I'm not a linux newbie, but I'm no sysadmin either. The thing that's making me question my choice is that I dont plan to take advantage of Unraid's killer feature; the abilty to add any size disk into your array. I've already got as many disks as the case will hold (8 x 12TB). When the inevitable day comes that I need more storage, I'll probably just build a second machine.

I've also looked at TrueNAS Scale a bit, and it seems approachable, but perhaps more capable than I really need. I do plan to run a number of containerized apps, but don't expect I'll need to run any VMs very often. I'm also not sure how I feel about ZFS. I read so many conflicting opinions. So, I haven't decided on a file system yet either.

My primary use cases are: media server, storage server, and homelab playground. I want to self-host as many things as possible so I can stop depending so heavily on enshittifying cloud services. I know I can look a lot of this stuff up And I have been reading whatever I can find. But much of what I've learned in recent months has been a direct result of reading this sub, so I'd love to tap into the knowledge found here.

My testing setup is, all on the same subnet, ipv4

• Windows Machine with Intel x520
• • Direct Connect 10Gbps cable
• USW Aggregation switch (10Gbps)
• • Direct Connect 10Gbps cable
• Synology NAS with Intel x520
• • SRVIO Connection
• Debian VM

.\iperf3.exe -c 192.168.11.57  --get-server-output
Connecting to host 192.168.11.57, port 5201
[  5] local 192.168.11.132 port 56855 connected to 192.168.11.57 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.01   sec   817 MBytes  6.79 Gbits/sec
[  5]   1.01-2.00   sec   806 MBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.01   sec   822 MBytes  6.85 Gbits/sec
[  5]   3.01-4.00   sec   805 MBytes  6.81 Gbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.01   sec   818 MBytes  6.81 Gbits/sec
[  5]   5.01-6.00   sec   806 MBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.01   sec   821 MBytes  6.83 Gbits/sec
[  5]   7.01-8.00   sec   805 MBytes  6.80 Gbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.01   sec   820 MBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec
[  5]   9.01-10.00  sec   809 MBytes  6.84 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  7.94 GBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec                  sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  7.94 GBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec                  receiver

Server output:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201 (test #9)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.11.132, port 56854
[  5] local 192.168.11.57 port 5201 connected to 192.168.11.132 port 56855
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   806 MBytes  6.76 Gbits/sec
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   812 MBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   816 MBytes  6.85 Gbits/sec
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   812 MBytes  6.81 Gbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   812 MBytes  6.81 Gbits/sec
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   812 MBytes  6.81 Gbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   815 MBytes  6.84 Gbits/sec
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   811 MBytes  6.80 Gbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   814 MBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   815 MBytes  6.84 Gbits/sec
[  5]  10.00-10.00  sec  1.12 MBytes  4.81 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  7.94 GBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec                  receiver


iperf Done.

.\iperf3.exe -c 192.168.11.57  --get-server-output -R
Connecting to host 192.168.11.57, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.11.57 is sending
[  5] local 192.168.11.132 port 56845 connected to 192.168.11.57 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.01   sec  1.11 GBytes  9.40 Gbits/sec
[  5]   1.01-2.00   sec  1.09 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.01   sec  1.11 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   3.01-4.00   sec  1.09 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.01   sec  1.11 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   5.01-6.00   sec  1.09 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.01   sec  1.11 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   7.01-8.00   sec  1.09 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.01   sec  1.11 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   9.01-10.00  sec  1.09 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.0 GBytes  9.46 Gbits/sec    0             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.0 GBytes  9.46 Gbits/sec                  receiver

Server output:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201 (test #7)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.11.132, port 56844
[  5] local 192.168.11.57 port 5201 connected to 192.168.11.132 port 56845
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.42 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]  10.00-10.00  sec  2.50 MBytes  7.72 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.0 GBytes  9.46 Gbits/sec    0             sender


iperf Done.

I find that rather curious, something in the windows 10 tcp settings that limit the outgoing throughput, window size maybe?

ip link show ens3 | grep -i "mtu"
2: ens3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000

::: spoiler Windows MTU

netsh interface ipv4 show subinterfaces

   MTU  MediaSenseState   Bytes In  Bytes Out  Interface
------  ---------------  ---------  ---------  -------------
  1500                1  273580016987  64376522487  Ethernet 4

I recently had my Proxmox host fail, so I re-installed and recovered all my VMs from backups.

I'm noticing that my file structure (this is on my NAS where Proxmox mounts it via SMB/CIFS) has some duplicate folders in it. The ones I highlighted are all empty. Is this normal? Can these be removed safely?

I've managed to get TrueNAS connected to Active Directory and created a share that I can access from an AD account on a Windows client just fine. However when I try to mount the share on Ubuntu Server 24.04 I keep getting permission/logon failure.

In my fstab entry I've tried every combo I can think of.

domain=domain,user=user,password=pass domain=domain.local,user=user,password=pass user=domain\user,password=pass user=domain.local\user,password=pass

I've also tried a separate credentials file with every one of those combinations as well as versions 2.1 and 3.0. I've got no problem mounting shares from the Windows server without even specifying the domain.

At this point I'm pretty sure I'm missing a setting on TrueNAS but no idea what. Any ideas?

So I just added a TP-Link switch (TL-SG3428X) and access point (EAP670) to my network, using OPNSense for routing, and was previously using a TP-Link SX-3008F switch as an aggregate (which I no longer need). I’m still within the return window for the new switch and access point, and have to admit the sale prices were my main reason with going for these items. I understand there have been recent articles mentioning TP-Link and security risks, so I’m thinking if I should consider returning these, and upping my budget to go for ubiquity? The AP would only be like $30 more for an equivalent, so that’s negligible, but a switch that meets my needs is about 1.6x more, however still only has 2 SFP+ ports, while I need 3 at absolute minimum.

I’m generally happy with the performance, however there is a really annoying bug where if I reboot a device, the switch drops down to 1G speed instead of 10G, and I have to tinker with the settings or reboot the switch to get 10G working again. This is true for the OPNSense uplink, my NAS and workstation. Same thing happened with the 3008F, and support threads on the forums have not been helpful.

In any case, any opinions of switching to ubiquity would be worth it?

I'm running a Docker-based homelab that I manage primarily via Portainer, and I'm struggling with how to handle container updates. At first, I had all containers pulling latest, but I thought maybe this was a bad idea as I could end up updating a container without intending to. So, I circled back and pinned every container image in my docker-compose files.

Then I started looking into how to handle updates. I've heard of Watchtower, but I noticed the Linuxserver.io images all recommend not running Watchtower and instead using Diun. In looking into it, I learned it will notify you of updates based on the tag you're tracking for the container, meaning it will never do anything for my containers pinned to a specific version. This made me think maybe I've taken the wrong approach.

What is the best practice here? I want to generally try to keep things up to date, but I don't want to accidentally break things. My biggest fear about tracking latest is that I make some other change in a docker-compose and update the stack which pulls latest for all the container in that stack and breaks some of them with unintended updates. Is this a valid concern, and if so, how can I overcome it?

Hi Everyone

I will try and keep it sort, my friend and I both do our own homelabs the usual stuff Radarr, Pi-hole, TrueNas, Proxmox etc.

Now we want to do a bit of silly thing as the title says, regards to Fax'ing we just want to be able to do send faxs to eachother (memes, guides etc.) We both have a cisco SPA2102 VoIP which to our understanding should do the trick.

I have tried to find stuff on the internet to see if I could find a guide or some idea on how to do this in a modern internet method but without luck, so I was hoping to either get a bit of help or straight answer saying "Just use email man"

Hosting your own PrivateDNS for Android?

How do you run your own DNS for privateDNS for Android?

I am currently using OPNsense with unbound for my DNS. My wireguard vpn is also on OPNsense.

I have LSIO Swag for my reverse proxy with Let's Encrypt and CloudFlare for my SSL and DNS.

Docker compose for my containers.

Can Pi-Hole, Ad Guard Home, Technitium be used as and entry for PrivateDNS on android?

Hey there, im looking into setting up a DNS Server in my Homelab, i would like something like this:

1. Server in Docker on my Proxmox Server
2. Server in Docker on my NAS and
3. Server in my "Cloud" Network

Do you guys have any recommendations on how i could accomplish this? Otherwise i will just use PiHole with sync again or something like it :)

Anyone an expert in Synology here?

Synology's Hybrid Raid (SHR) is a funky little system, especially since it's built on standard Linux tools.

What I'm wondering though, is how data is distributed when you change the disks in the system.

Imagine I have 2x1TB drives and 2x4TB drives in a system.

• First it creates a 4x1TB "chunk" which is essentially RAID5. (3TB available)
• Next it creates a 2x3TB chunk which acts like RAID1 (although internally may be calculated like a RAID5 parity.) (3TB available from this)

Now let's say I replace those two 1TB drives with 4TBs (safely, preserving data, etc.), and tell SHR to expand to use the new drives. I can see a number of scenarios from this point:

• It mirrors the two new blocks into another 3TB chunk, giving me 9TB total. (3 from RAID5, 3 from first mirror pair, 3 from second mirror pair)
• It expands the 3TB mirror into a second RAID5 group, giving 12TB total. (3 initial plus 9 in the second group)
• It does the same thing and also rewrites the data on the (former) 3TB mirror pair to be striped across all four disks
• It expands the 3TB mirror to RAID5, *and merges it with the original 3TB RAID group, giving a single 12TB RAID5.
• Again it does the same thing but with rewriting of the data that was formerly just mirrored.

This isn't likely to be a huge deal, but I'd like to know how it works under the covers.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/16452222

Hello friends, I've been pulling my hair out trying to figure out how to get my service to properly play well with traefik.

My service is reachable at /dnd-notes/page, but the service needs to fetch additional resources and fails to do so.

IE: user navigates to /dnd-notes/foobar

foobar loads. foobar fetches /.client/main.css foobar fails to find this resource.

Here is my static configuration:

## traefik-static.yml
providers:
  docker:     
    exposedByDefault: false
    
api:
  insecure: true
  dashboard: true

entryPoints: 
  web:
    address: :80
  websecure:  
    address: :443
    
log:
  level: DEBUG

Here is my compose:

services:
  traefik:
    image: "traefik:latest"
    container_name: "traefik"
    ports:
      - "80:80"
      - "8080:8080"
    volumes:
      - "/var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro"
      - "./traefik/traefik.yaml:/etc/traefik/traefik.yaml"

  silverbullet:
    image: zefhemel/silverbullet
    container_name: "dnd-notes"
    volumes:
      - './dnd-notes/space:/space'
    labels:
      - "traefik.enable=true"
      - "traefik.http.routers.dndnotes.rule=PathPrefix(`/dnd-notes/`)"
      - "traefik.http.routers.dndnotes.service=dndnotes"
      - "traefik.http.routers.dndnotes.entrypoints=web"
      - "traefik.http.routers.dndnotes.middlewares=dndnotes_stripprefix"
      - "traefik.http.services.dndnotes.loadbalancer.server.port=3000"
      - "traefik.http.middlewares.dndnotes_stripprefix.stripprefix.prefixes=/dnd-notes"

This is more "home networking" than "homelab," but I imagine the people here might be familiar with what in talking about.

I'm trying to understand the logic behind ISPs offering asymmetrical connections. From a usage standpoint, the vast majority of traffic goes to the end-user instead of from the end-user. From a technical standpoint, though, it seems like it would be more difficult and more expensive to offer an asymmetrical connection.

While consumers may be connected via fiber, cable, DSL, etc, I assume that the ISP has a number of fiber links to "the internet." Those links are almost surely some symmetrical standard (maybe 40 or 100Gb). So if they assume that they can support 1000 users at a certain download speed, what is the advantage of limiting the upload? If their incoming trunks can support 1000 users at 100Mb download, shouldn't it also support 1000 users at 100Mb upload since the trunks themselves are symmetrical?

Limiting the upload speed to a different rate than download seems like it would just add a layer of complexity. I don't see a financial benefit either; if their links are already saturated for download, reducing upload speed doesn't help them add additional users. Upload bandwidth doesn't magically turn into download bandwidth.

Obviously there's some reason for this, but I can't think of one.

hey,

I'm getting a 3D printer soon. Its on it way right now actually. I was wondering if anyone here has a 3D printer projects that are useful for a Homelab. Hard drive caddies are the only thing I can think of, that would be useful in the homelab. Of course I'm going to use it for other non homelab projects. So ideas would be highly appreciated! Thank you!

I recently upgraded my homelab core switch to a Mellanox SX 6012. It’s 12 ports of 40gb/s, and each can break out to 10gb/s. This switch also idles at 30 watts which was top of my list.

What model switches are you running, and do you like it?