I honestly love it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 day ago (5 children)

"They" is completely legitimate to use. "They" isn't non-binary exclusive.

I'm not sure why that should make you uncomfortable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (4 children)

    Oh it doesn't make me uncomfortable, but it irks my sense of grammar somehow. Stands out when reading. I know of course that "they" is appropriate when no further information about someone is available, but that would not apply here since it's their partner 🫠.

    Perhaps you could clarify for me not that if someone could, but why they would. That doesnt seem to make sense to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    When gender is irrelevant to the story being told, it's normal to leave it out in just such a way. Just like they left out lots of other superfluous details that don't irk you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    Fair enough, perhaps because it feels that way to me because my native language genders everything. Though i still have a hard time imagining people regularly referring to their partner as them im casual conversation, thats the bf/gf/husband/wife instinctively.

    Would you conversely say it is weird to refer to your partner as above when not strictly required?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I still have to pay attention to my words because I use gendered language reflexively from years of learned behavior (US English here) and I don't get it right all the time, so I'll be the first to say it's not only not weird to say "my wife" or the like, it is in fact far too damn easy for the words to just fall out on their own. It's been practice for me to get used to saying spouse and partner but I think it's good overall to omit the gendered aspect when it is irrelevant simply because the result is more inclusive language that resonates with an even larger audience.

    We stopped including things like skin color and sexuality as an extraneous identifying detail in conversation a long while back (speaking in a really broad generality here, forgive me please) because people recognized it as othering. I feel like we're getting there with gendered language and like it's for the best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 17 hours ago

    Interesting. Thats not really applicable to my language though, german is renowned for having specific terms for almost everything, and if it doesnt exist you can just make a new compound word for it and it will be fine. There is a reason english loans quite a few of our words to fill out the sparse vocabulary. Such a naturally descriptive language of course also affects how and what people communicate, and even think.

    For example, i could not even refer to my gf as my gender neutral partner without going out of my way to clarify that "Partner" does not mean a man but something unspecified.

  • source
  • parent