you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 days ago (1 child)

That’s fair. I’m a fan of open weight models, but the fact that they’re not open source and are instead akin to a compiled binary means there could be something nefarious hidden within. Best policy is to use proper guardrails with any LLM and don’t blindly trust it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    I agree! See my comment about the US nuclear industry though. Humans are lazy when given an easy option so the probability of a problem skyrockets just by using LLMs.

    In an ideal world they would never have been invented and we'd all be better off. For now I would accept something to the effect of restricting LLM use to the extent of "advanced search engine" and " really good static analysis tool"; it can point but can't touch. I recognize that there's very little in the way of distinguishing those uses and ultimately it would be better to never use it for any reason at all.

  • source
  • parent