I was just being specific. But there are many communist traditions. Some care more about the class structure (Marxists), some about power structures (anarchists). And then the subdivisions multiply like fruitflies.

Besides the class / power divide there's the utopian / materialist divide. The only communist movements that achieved anything so far have been ML and ML-Maoist (MLM), both materialist lines. Anarchists are usually utopian, like, I agree with anarco-communists' philosofical positions and what the end goal should be, but how does one protect its people and revolution without the Autority and Power of the State? The proletarian state can only be abolished (practically) after all couter revolutionary states have been abolished

uh, and now I realize I copletely avoided your question. Honestly, idk. I can list some gloabal characteristics, and anti-characteristics, but that's about it. I can also tell you that if a first worlder say they are a commie I find it highly suspicious, 9/10 they don't know what they're talking about