you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Except there ARE degrees of trust.

Microsoft for software that runs on your local systems and can be airgapped = probably fine.

Microsoft as SaaS (Azure and co) = probably fine as well

Microsoft's AI department = read the damn privacy policy. If I needed frontier model support for a large organisation, I'd sooner trust a Bedrock or similar hosted Anthropic model than a Microsoft service...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

    Microsoft as SaaS (Azure and co) = probably fine as well

    When access to a service can be shut off in an instant by an order of the U.S. government—as has been demonstrated with the ICC—there is a national security risk in relying on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Ah, you're right. My primary aspect here was MS accessing your data, not restricting your access to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

    Even without losing access to it, the U.S. CLOUD Act lets the federal government access the data on servers of U.S. companies hosted in other countries.

    That's why even 'sovereign' hosting solutions offered by U.S. companies are not a safeguard from overreach by the U.S. federal government.

  • source
  • parent