you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 56 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (11 children)

There was no real change of power, Denmark is still ruled by their xenophobic self-declared social democrats busy teaming up with Italian post-fascists to undermine international rule of law. While there is little meaningful difference between Mette Fredriksen and Georgia Meloni she's pretty much as left as Danish politics goes, the only parties left of this mess (the Ø and Å lists, not kidding) are marginal and have never had real power.

Traditionally Denmark has had no political line for themselves, and have followed America completely. They are completely new to trying to think original thoughts in terms of foreign policy, and we should expect to see them stumble a bit. I guess it's refreshing to see them pretend to try.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 4 days ago (9 children)

    Kind of hard words like xenophobic, fascist for parties democratically voted for by the majority of voters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 days ago*

    Georgia Meloni represents Fratelli d'Italia, the successor party of the Alleanza Nazionale, which in turn is the successor of the Movimento Sociale Italiano, which was Mussolini's party. The succession is direct enough that Fratelli d'Italia still uses the same logo as MSI; a tricolor flame.

    See if you can spot the similarity:

    If anything I was being generous to Georgia Meloni by referring to her party as post-fascist rather than straight out fascist. There is a clear continuation here. This is not a matter of opinion.

    As for the Social Democrats in Denmark being xenophobic, there's ample evidence. The fact that they would introduce ghetto laws to get rid of immigrant neighbourhoods - and even call them ghetto laws themselves - is one interesting high-profile example.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    I dont know any of denmarks politics, but both can be true. The NSDAP was more or less democratically elected, MAGA as well

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Saying the NSDAP was democratically elected to power is a perpetuating a fascist lie. The NSDAP was always using undemocratic methods, such as political violence and voter intimidation, and finally, outright banning and persecuting political opponents and entire political parties. That is not being elected more or less democratically.

    If you have been taught bad history, then enlighten yourself, rather than continuing to give fascists false legitimacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago

    I have been taught good history, by my professors at uni, I am teaching history myself actually, have today actually.

    Of course they had their propaganda, scare tactics against opponents and so on. Just like all populists, from the AfD, to MAGA. But they were in ar least one State in the Koalition, so part of the government, in 1930.

    After that they were more and more populistic and hateful and despite that they won more and more votes over the following years

    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalsozialistische_Deutsche_Arbeiterpartei#Wahlergebnisse_bei_den_Reichstagswahlen_1930%E2%80%931933_nach_Wahlkreisen

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago

    It is kinda true though, we just call it something else. And fascism is on the rise here, along with xenophobia. We were always among the first to join the USA in wars while suppressing any questions from critics in the process.

  • source
  • parent