46
Linux Distribution Chooser Tool (unknownuniverse.uk)
submitted 4 days ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 days ago (2 children)

I haven't used Arch in a long time, but from what I remember...

Arch and Gentoo are both rolling releases, but Gentoo is rolling stable while Arch is bleeding edge.

If you game, you can't beat being able to drop kernel patches in a folder and have them applied on every update. Works for all packages, not just the kernel.

GURU has a bit more oversight than the AUR, but not as many packages.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    I'm thinking Arch is definitely for me, then:

    • I prefer bleeding edge. No delay, things haven't broken my system in a decade, seems like it's fine for personal use anyway.
    • I don't need any kernel patches as a heavy gamer, my system can run whatever you throw at it.
    • The AUR seems to have a far simpler and less convoluted process for contributing than GURU.

    Still, I'm curious: what kernel patches do you feel the need to apply, as a gamer?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    You can enable the bleeding edge too, if you like. The repos have multiple versions of packages.

    I need the bigsceen beyond patches for better VR support.

    I've never contributed to the AUR, so I can't really compare. GURU does have a bit of process in exchange for some oversight, but there are completely unmoderated overlays too.

    That's completely fair! I think pacman is a much nicer to use package manager than emerge, and Arch has a great community :3

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent