▲ 311 ▼ Microsoft And Epic Games Suddenly Agree That AI Is Theft - [about DMCA against AI-coded browser ports for Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, and Halo-related web browser] (kotaku.com) submitted 2 days ago* by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca 70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml -16 points 2 days ago (3 children) Yes it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children) Show the law then, because theft has requirements that copyright infringement doesn't accomplish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 days ago* (1 child) I'm not talking about a specific law... In example by law training Ai by content without your consent is not theft. But yet, we know it is theft. What law are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tempest@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago Copyright infringement is copyright infringement. Theft is theft. These things are not the same regardless of how you feel about them. No country treats copyright infringement as theft, and no country treats theft as copyright infringement. They are legally different things with different requirements. Copyright infringement can potentially feel like theft, but it still isn't, because it does not meet the legal criteria for theft. These are legal terms, they are not based on how you feel. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children) Show the law then, because theft has requirements that copyright infringement doesn't accomplish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 days ago* (1 child) I'm not talking about a specific law... In example by law training Ai by content without your consent is not theft. But yet, we know it is theft. What law are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tempest@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago Copyright infringement is copyright infringement. Theft is theft. These things are not the same regardless of how you feel about them. No country treats copyright infringement as theft, and no country treats theft as copyright infringement. They are legally different things with different requirements. Copyright infringement can potentially feel like theft, but it still isn't, because it does not meet the legal criteria for theft. These are legal terms, they are not based on how you feel. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 days ago* (1 child) I'm not talking about a specific law... In example by law training Ai by content without your consent is not theft. But yet, we know it is theft. What law are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tempest@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago Copyright infringement is copyright infringement. Theft is theft. These things are not the same regardless of how you feel about them. No country treats copyright infringement as theft, and no country treats theft as copyright infringement. They are legally different things with different requirements. Copyright infringement can potentially feel like theft, but it still isn't, because it does not meet the legal criteria for theft. These are legal terms, they are not based on how you feel. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago Copyright infringement is copyright infringement. Theft is theft. These things are not the same regardless of how you feel about them. No country treats copyright infringement as theft, and no country treats theft as copyright infringement. They are legally different things with different requirements. Copyright infringement can potentially feel like theft, but it still isn't, because it does not meet the legal criteria for theft. These are legal terms, they are not based on how you feel. permalink fedilink source parent