you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

You must not be working professionally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago* (1 child)

    Working professionals are, if at all competent to be committing code to a professional code base, entirely capable of writing their own commit messages.

    If they can't write the commit message, they can't sufficiently explain in writing the commit they just made to anyone. So, they should not be working professionally on a code base.

    If they are capable of writing the commit message with their own understanding in their own words, but they choose not to communicate their understanding in the commit message? Also disqualifying, they should not be working professionally on a code base. Human communication is essential to this work.

    That this is a controversial position, is a clear sign of the Slopocalypse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 53 minutes ago

    Now I definitely know you haven't seen a real professional codebase. Professional git repos are full of one sentence commit messages with little to no explanation of what's in the change set.

    Humans suck at communication, especially when there's pressure to get product features out the door. AI driven repos are full of beautifully summarized commits with clear explanations of architectural choices, change motivation, etc.

  • source
  • parent