this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
1211 points (96.2% liked)

memes

16145 readers
2935 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why the 'IIII' insted of 'IV'?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Prevents confusion between the four and the six: III, IV, V, VI, when the watch is not held perfectly vertically for viewing.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

Actually very common in watches with roman numbers iirc

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i'm pretty sure that IV is a modern typographic thing

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I've also heard that, because in Latin IV is the beginning of "IVPPITER" (Jupiter), there’s a theory that people avoided using "IV" as to not “disrespect” the god’s name. 🤷‍♀️

Also, on a 12 hour clock, 3 sets of four looks clean af I guess, e.g.:

  • I, II, III, IIII
  • V, VI, VII, VIII
  • IX, X, XI, XII
[–] Merva@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Since the IIII usage is common in the Middle Ages and even into the Early Modern Period, when nobody believed in Jupiter, that is obviously just something somebody made up.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It could have also started from that and continued on despite people not knowing the reason, no? I do agree that it's quite silly and unlikely, though.

[–] Nerrad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

May as well just go with VIIII then. Or maybe 9.

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago