Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast ... as it gets better, we'll become too dependent.

"all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,,,"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

The major thing that killed 1960s/70s AI was the Vietnam War. MIT's CSAIL was funded heavily by DARPA. When public opinion turned against Vietnam and Congress started shutting off funding, DARPA wasn't putting money into CSAIL anymore. Congress didn't create an alternative funding path, so the whole thing dried up.

That lab basically created computing as we know it today. It bore fruit, and many companies owe their success to it. There were plenty of promising lines of research still going on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Pretty sure "AI" didn't exist in the 60s/70s either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments