this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
0 points (50.0% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

3038 readers
5 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And it seems karmacourt will be the first to posit that the fediverse is worth "putting in its place", going by the upvotes in such an empty community that probably discourages those kinds of suits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Joeyowlhouse@lemmy.wtf 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Context for those unaware:

"A friend of mine" OP is referring to Call Me Leni, who was banned from several instances and communities for being a KiwiFarms member, among other things, and OP has a grudge against the Fediverse for this. Leni shouldn't have linked their KiwiFarms posts on Lemmy, and linked Lemmy threads talking about them on their KiwiFarms account. That wasn't very bright of them.

Proof 1

Proof 2

Modlog

Call me Leni also defended KiwiFarms as a "free speech" site and tried to conflate the hate site with Discord:

I take it OP feels like the Fediverse is violating "free speech" for banning KiwiFarms members.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not her. We went over this in my last post you visited. You are just stalking at this point. What grudge do you have against me anyways? Is it not clear we are talking about a common subject?

As for the rest, anyone can click a link within a link.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is fucking hysterical. You realize the person you're replying to didn't say you were Call Me Leni? You denying it without accusation like that is uh... not a great look!

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This shit's hilarious. They're so deep in the "just asking for a friend" trope, that they get defensive pre-emptively, therefore giving up the game.

I will say for sure, Leni sure does a lot of random "friends" who routinely pop up on the same social media she hangs out in, to defend her with a massive amount of insider knowledge. I barely get my friends to even look at memes on fediverse I sent them :D. Leni has the most obsessive and dedicated "friends" in the world, I'll tell ya.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is way, way past my bedtime, and my meds wore off, so out of curiosity I clicked through to the link on Reddit again and...

Yeah there's no way that the user who submitted this to 'court' isn't the same fucking person. I'm going to quote a post they made to /r/Lemmy. I don't recommend trying to read it, but if you do... yeah they're all the same person. I'm done playing nice about it. See if this doesn't read in the exact same terrible, unreadable way:

"For those of you who don't know, there was an act of terror that was on the news a few days ago where the perpetrator happened to be a Lemmy World mod, and everyone is talking about it due to this (and then another act of terror that happened in the same span of time where the perpetrator wasn't a mod but where the guy expressed support for a certain guy Lemmy loves loud and clear, which one might say makes site morals look bad). The site has been known to ban anyone who supports Musk's rhetoric as well as anyone who is registered with KF as many will always be willing to being up for ages, but what about this new evolving rhetoric? Trump is in office and just barely saved Tiktok.

On behalf of a few instances, I have been asked if you all might defederate Lemmy World, even though I have been hesitant until now to even bring it up. To me at least, I'm sure most people are going to say "apologists > murderers" as would make sense."

First of all, no one is asking this individual to represent their instance, let alone a few instances. Second, the top comment to that is literally identical to the top comments on almost everything this person writes:

"I'm confused as what you're trying to say. I tried to follow the links, but that didn't make it clearer, either."

Godspeed, /u/triangularRectum420. You represent us all today.

And CraigOhMyEggo copped a ban from Santabot on slrpnk for being an alt of Leni. That's enough for me.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The solarpunk bot banned me for a DM. None of us here are one person. If this is you playing nice, I'd be curious to know what your mean side looks like.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They literally said

I'm done playing nice about it.

in the comment you replied too?

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 week ago

That's indeed what he said.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

and OP has a grudge against the Fediverse for this.

I take it OP feels like the Fediverse is violating “free speech” for banning KiwiFarms members.

Uh, yes he did. And he has made that accusation in the past.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't care about an accusation made in the past. I was responding to you denying an accusation that wasn't made in this post. You were denying it without accusation here. You can't, and shouldn't, expect the readers in this thread to be aware of any conversations you've had in the past, and if you're going to defend against those, it should either be made clear that they weren't made here, or you should defend against those comments where they were made.

Because, in absence of that claim here, as I said, you're defending against an accusation that wasn't made here.

Eta: You copped a ban from Santa on slrpnk.net for being an alt of CallMeLeni, so that uh... seems to lend it some credence.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Simple comprehension error. Someone corrected me. Not even the point.

The solarpunk bot banned me for a DM.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Love the petty bullshit of all your replies to me telling you off, which were correct, including links to the same comment where someone says I could've made my point clearer.

Congrats. You found one person who says your reading comprehension might be understandable, out of the entirety of the rest of the commenters here, who all tell you to stop with your bullshit crusade.... and your reaction is to passive-aggressively try and shoehorn their one comment into every single other thing you reply to me with.

I'm going to tell you, even though you refuse to listen- "engagement" isn't a metric of success. If 300 people tell you to shut up, that isn't 300 new friends. That's "you are wrong," writ large. And since you don't understand this either, on any of these other posts you make- people stopping replying to you also doesn't somehow make your points true. It just means you're more exhausting than entertaining.

This is to just to say, I'm done here. I'm going to go back to blissfully ignoring you until your next bullshit move to try and defend Leni, at which point I'll probably link whatever new folks are stumbling on your ongoing nonsense to this thread. Or any others. Goodbye. Enjoy your meaningless reply. I won't be answering it.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -1 points 2 weeks ago

If "engagement" isn't a metric of success, why do you maintain the numbers of people telling me to shut up is a metric of the need to be quiet? Especially when my only intent here was to share something I thought would fit the community, not to "crusade"? If 95% of the people in dbzer0 are those who will feel angst over every little thing, by your logic, does that make it a bad community? Because I can see through yours.