this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
167 points (98.3% liked)

Games

39818 readers
838 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait, what?

First of all, PC gamers don't buy a ton of games.

PC is the number one piracy platform for starters, seeing as it requires no jailbreaks and the like.

Secondly, PC gamers tend to own a lot of games legitimately because our gaming library doesn't expire with a console generation, and because our steam libraries consist of many many indie games that cost a few bucks each, not a few $50 AAA releases.

My steam library is about 435-ish games. But that's since 2013.

The total value of the account per steamdb is like £1080, this is a vast over-estimate because I used to live in a country where the entire GTA series before 5 cost £0.20, but let's go with £1080.

If I bought £1080 worth of standard £60 games, I'd only have 18 games. That's actually less than I even had for the PS Vita, and most people would be surprised to know that platform even has that many games.

Between the online fees and subscriptions to PS Plus etc., lacking discounts compared to steam, and the inability to pirate even an extremely high end PC tends to be far, far cheaper in the long run than a console, especially since it also doubles as the TV, the music player, the work and hobby computer, etc etc.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never heard of a steam backlog? PC is the number one piracy platform, but it's also the only platform where people buy whole bundles of games in a sale or where you get at least one game for free every week.

Have a look at Nintendos sales figures: https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/finance/hard_soft/index.html

Take for example the switch: 152 mio devices sold, vs 1391 mio units of software sold. That's roughly 9 titles per device since 2017, or roughly one game per year.

Compare that to your 435 titles over 12 years, which equals roughly 36 titles per year.

You are a heavy buyer of games, in the order of 36x of what's the average for a switch user. You just proved my point.

Btw, these 9 titles would have cost a switch user just €540, if all of them were AAA games at full price. That too doesn't factor in that the figure from Nintendo includes massively popular cheap indie titles or the fact that even Nintendo games sometimes go on sale.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Btw, these 9 titles would have cost a switch user just €540, if all of them were AAA games at full price. That too doesn't factor in that the figure from Nintendo includes massively popular cheap indie titles or the fact that even Nintendo games sometimes go on sale.

Yes, I'm a heavy buyer of games, but those games cost £12 on average, not £60, nor anywhere near to that amount, even if it's lower due to the few indie games that get console releases.

€540 for those 9 games is roughly more than half of what I spent in the last decade on 430-ish PC games. It's literally why I even have more games in the first place.

So even though I have more games on paper, I don't spend more paper, capische?

And I certainly don't spend more per game than the switch user, which makes your claim misleading.

In fact the opposite is true and most PC gamers are notoriously stringent in spending on games.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are fighting windmills, capische?

You made up an argument that I never made and now you are fighting against it.

Well done, Don Quijote, the windmill is destroyed and you can go home claiming you defended the land from evil giants.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you made up an argument that I never made

Original comment I'm responding to states:

so the total cost of ownership for a switch 2 probably still stays under the total cost of ownership for a handheld PC.

That point is incorrect. That is the point I'm disputing.

Maybe chill out bro it's ok to be wrong on the internet, the world goes on.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Price of the middle version of the Steam Deck: €569

Price of the middle version of the Switch 1: €284

So we got a price difference of €285 here.

€50 for the bundled Mario Kart upgrade plus 3 other full price titles, leaves us €55 to spend on another 5 indie titles, and then you got the average total cost of ownership for a switch for just about the price of the Steam Deck with a whopping 0 games on it.


The difference becomes starker if you go for the top-spec version: €679 for the Steam Deck, vs €329 for the Switch, a whopping €350 difference. For that difference you can afford Mario Kart plus 4 full-price titles and have another €60 remaining for a few indie titles.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lmao so you include all the deals for the switch with your "mario kart upgrade", but not the steam deck?

Ironically enough a steam deck with zero games on it is still a way more compelling device if we're describing a generic gaming device,, because all games on PC are free if you want them to be, and that's a library of hundreds of thousands of games. Then you consider it's also your laptop/main PC too...

Plus, if you must buy games, you're only a few quid away from one, not £60 + online fees etc etc.

We can go in circles forever though, but over the long term of course a PC or any Steam Deck will win in terms of ownership cost due to cheaper/free games. The issue is that we can't really calculate an objective metric of value there.

That also isn't the point I was even disputing, it's precisely that the ownership is more expensive because PC gamers buy more games, but either way you're wrong.

But if we keep going, we'll run into problems because of course it's apples to oranges to compare the value because these are largely mutually exclusive target audiences I'd imagine.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

because all games on PC are free if you want them to be

If you include piracy, that's available on the Switch too. Worst case you have to chip in €10 for a mod chip, but that's it.

Lmao so you include all the deals for the switch with your “mario kart upgrade”, but not the steam deck?

Yeah, find me a deal to get Mario Kart for the steam deck legally.

Then you consider it’s also your laptop/main PC too…

You want to use a steam deck as a laptop? Do you really have no self respect?

That also isn’t the point I was even disputing, it’s precisely that the ownership is more expensive because PC gamers buy more games, but either way you’re wrong.

That was exactly my point. Steam Decks/PCs and consoles are used differently by different people, and in the end a Steam Deck is not cheaper than a console, even if you never pay a cent for a game (but then again, why are you buying a Steam Deck?)

But if we keep going

I get the feeling you don't actually want to discuss or talk about the topic, you just want to win. So yeah, no point in continuing the discussion.