this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
96 points (97.1% liked)

World News

47460 readers
1947 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary: as it could be expected, Iran retaliated. Some of the missiles were shot down, but some appear to have landed in central Tel Aviv.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Opinion:

Politically, the ayatollah can't be toppled by foreseeable events, except if an Israeli strike should kill him. His successor in that case is unlikely to be milder. Netanyahu is also firmly in power due to special circumstances, and probably pretty safe from any Iranian attempts.

Militarily, Iran has taken bigger losses, and has probably lost expensive and important parts of its nuclear programme - but not its stocks of highly enriched uranium, or its ability to launch ballistic missiles. From that perspective, if the Israeli strikes were meant to disarm Iran - they didn't.

Prognosis: they will trade more strikes and neither will achieve breakthrough success. Iran will lose more in the process.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hum... I only disagree on that it looks like the entire reason Israel is attacking is that Netanyahu isn't firmly in power.

If Israel starts getting seriously hit, I'd expect him to fall. But the consequences of that can go both ways.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

remember netanyahu, fell ill just days before the israels unprovoked attack. yea he needs a distraction from the gaza issue.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The majority of Israelis support the genocide and want Gaza cleared out

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 5 points 1 day ago

Lot of them are the most cowards too

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Iran has produced enough highly enriched uranium to potentially create multiple nuclear weapons, with estimates suggesting it could have enough for up to nine atomic bombs. What's the chance that there is a possibility of Iran using this material in various forms of warfare, including dirty bombs?

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Iran will not give Israel a pretext to nuke the place. Dirty bombs are not an effective mean of warfare, just a mean of terror. So far Iran has aimed its missiles at military targets, like the Israeli Ministry of Defense in Tel Aviv. Iran wants to weaken the Israeli military, and more importantly the support of the Israeli population and Israels allies. A dirty bomb would cause the opposite for all of that.