this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
897 points (99.3% liked)

News

30540 readers
2902 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The NAACP announced Monday the group will not invite President Donald Trump to its national convention next month in Charlotte, North Carolina, the first time the prominent civil rights organization has opted to exclude a sitting president in its 116-year history.

NAACP President Derrick Johnson announced the move at an afternoon press conference, accusing Trump of working against its mission.

“This has nothing to do with political party,” Johnson said in a statement. “Our mission is to advance civil rights, and the current president has made clear that his mission is to eliminate civil rights.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The group also noted that Republican President Ronald Reagan accepted its invitation during his first year in office. Civil rights leaders had criticized Reagan’s use during the 1980 campaign of the term “welfare queen” to refer to people abusing federal aid. The term was viewed by many as coded racial language for Black women.

He certainly meant all the white welfare queens! /s

I will now quote Lee Atwater in 1981, apologies for the offensive terminology, but these shitheads speak this way:

You start out in 1954 by saying, “~~N----r, n----r, n----r~~.” By 1968 you can’t say “~~n----r~~”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “~~N----r, n----r~~.”

https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategy/

Gosh, I wonder if they're (repubs) racist…?

[–] admiralpatrick@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This comment was reported for containing racial slurs. First off, thanks, good call.

That said, taking things into context and the fact that they're part of a direct quote providing historical context, I'm allowing the comment to remain for now for that reason.

@some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org If you wouldn't mind masking out the slurs (e.g. n----r), I think that might satisfy any potential concerns with regard to automods, content filters, or misunderstandings without diluting the gravity of the context it's providing.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's why I used the strikethrough, but you're right. I could do better. Amended.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

You did fine before the edit. Nothing wrong quoting ass holes showing they're ass holes and shitty ways of thinking.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I prefer quotes to be as close to the original as possible. Hurtful as it is. That's kind of the point here.

Censoring the bad shit that happened before is a sure way to repeat it. See holocaust denial for the extreme. Don't deny talking about the past just because it hurts.

[–] admiralpatrick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Yep, I totally agree with you. Just trying to address it head on while also appeasing as many viewpoints as possible.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago

Just FYI, that report from the automod is just that, a report, it's up to the human moderators to decide whether it's fine in the context or not, it wasn't meant as something that should be taken action on in each and every case.