this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
99 points (88.4% liked)
Progressive Politics
2817 readers
1369 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Iirc, current law allows for drafting from 18 to 26. No idea what would be required just to reinstate a draft, whether that would be a presidential declaration, law change, or something else entirely.
Edit: [this song] (https://youtu.be/0sajngb0W6I) may answer your question better
Ideally, there shouldn't be a draft. That's why we have the Reserves; so we don't need to enact a draft ever again.
Source: I served for 20 years in the US military. When the 2003 Iraq War kicked off, a bunch of people joined the Reserves to say they were doing their part without actually having to do anything. They were shocked when we sent them to war first.
The active duty military were already running operations at dozens of bases around the globe. We couldn't just drop everything and go join a war. So we sent the Reserves to set up new bases in the Middle East and started trickling in active duty members as the bases became more established. I didn't get to Iraq until 2007.
This is the intended effect of the Abrams Doctrine. After the abuse of presidential power that got the US into the Vietnam Conflict, Gen. Creighton Abrams wanted to make sure the entire country would feel the hit of the US' bellicose nature and to put a check on presidents wielding military power. Of course, these good intentions always get warped and SecDef Laird's Total Force Policy basically found a loophole for maintaining a larger fighting force that could be called up while playing Three Card Monty with the budgets.