this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
248 points (95.6% liked)
Working Class Calendar
1403 readers
109 users here now
!workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world is a working class calendar inspired by the now (2023-06-25) closed reddit r/aPeoplesCalendar aPeoplesCalendar.org, where we can post daily events.
Rules
All the requirements of the code of conduct of the instance must be followed.
Community Rules
1. It's against the rules the apology for fascism, racism, chauvinism, imperialism, capitalism, sexism, ableism, ageism, and heterosexism and attitudes according to these isms.
2. The posts should be about past working class events or about the community.
3. Cross-posting is welcomed.
4. Be polite.
5. Any language is welcomed.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, my claim is they're not treating him badly because treating him badly would help the U.S. government. If Alexei Navalny had come to the U.S., don't you think we would have granted him Asylum?
Again, Snowden went to Hong Kong. I don't have the time or interest to explain Hong Kong's history as a British Colony or the, "one country, two systems," principal, but the short explanation is that Hong Kong is a semi-autonomous region with a pro-democracy government that often clashes with the PRC.
He really wasn't. He had one assignment in Geneva, where he mostly did cybersecurity work. He had one field mission to recruit a Swiss Banker, and he was not good at it. Calling him a spy is like calling a medical examiner a cop; they work together, but they're not the same job.
Also, if you think Snowden was a Russian spy, don't you think anyone in the government would be eager to prove that? But the opposite happened. The FBI concluded that Snowden probably worked alone. NSA chief Michael Rogers came to the same conclusion. No one thinks he was a Russian spy except a small group of intelligence pundits and hacks.
Is Alexei Navalny a member of multiple Russian intelligence agencies? Nope.
Does the US have a history of locking up anyone from athletes, reporters, teachers, etc? Nope.
So there is no reason to believe he would have the same outcome as Snowden.
Why do you think you know the inner workings of intelligence agencies? I shouldn’t have to tell you that they are known for sharing as little as possible. It is their job.
He’s literally on the run to escape espionage charges…
Both the US and UK have very clearly accused him of being a spy…
Chelsea Manning was charged under the Espionage Act as well. Was she a Russian spy?
Here are the charges against Snowden from 2013:
Point to the part that indicates Russia, or any other government, as being implicated in any way. I don't know what to tell you, man; you swallowed this propaganda really hard, and now you're mad at the guy who tried to warn you that your government was spying on you.
Chelsea Manning plead guilty to espionage charge. This means she admitted she was a spy.
Whether or not she was spying for Russia hasn’t been determined to my knowledge.
Espionage is spying.
Snowden faces espionage (spying) charges which you have already acknowledged.
Proving whether or not he was spying for Russia is near impossible due to the nature of the crime so it is not a requirement of being charged with spying. This is why it wouldn’t be stated in your reference.
Instead, we have verified he committed espionage and that the stance of both the US and UK is that he was a spy.
So it comes down to who was he spying for?
Your conspiracy theory is that he ruined his life out of the kindness of his heart and it is just a coincidence that he ended up in Russia. Despite the fact that he chose to get on a plane headed there knowing his passport would be cancelled.
I think it is much more logical to infer that his motivation for spying was to serve the agenda of Russia. Because the consequences of his decisions are inline with Russian intelligence goals and he made deliberate choices that resulted in him receiving sanctuary in Russia.
As far as propaganda, your arguments have mirrored statements Russia has made on Snowden.
Oh yeah? Which statements are those? Because I know of one statement Putin made on Snowden, and it does not line up with what I've said. So please show me these statements that totally exist and weren't pulled out of your ass.
Basically nothing you said is correct. No one, even the most deranged right-wing war hawk, believes Chelsea Manning was a spy or working for Russia. Being charged with espionage does not mean you are a spy. That's not true from a literal or legal perspective.
At this point, you've gone past swallowing Fox News propaganda and begun fabricating your own. Get a grip dude.
You’re obviously trying to make a strawman argument about Chelsea Manning working for Russia because I never mentioned it as a possibility.
Or maybe your reading comprehension is just really bad because this is the definition of espionage:
You’ve proven you are willing to either lie or speak with confidence about things you don’t even know the definition of.
Here is a quote from Obama:
He points out that Russia is not treating Snowden the same as they do with anyone else. Which is what I’ve said also. This is called common sense not conspiracy, but you probably don’t know the definition of either.
I like how you quoted around the part that didn't support your argument.
Anyway, I think I'm done here. I was paying attention in 2013, so I actually followed the reporting on the Snowden leaks. You clearly didn't, but staked the position, "Putin = bad, therefore Snowden = Bad," without knowing what the fuck you're talking about, and now you're talking out your ass to try and back that position.
You desperately want to prove that Snowden is a spy because he was charged under the Espionage Act, but had you been paying attention during the Obama administration, you'd know he was the first President to bring espionage charges against leakers and whistleblowers instead of spies; he actually used it more than every other president combined. But you're blissfully unaware of this, just like you're unaware of the differences between Hong Kong and mainland China, or that Snowden didn't intend to stay in Russia, or that Chelsea Manning was never suspected of being a spy.
I mean, Jesus Chirst, you're quoting Obama talking about Snowden traveling without proper documentation without acknowledging that Obama canceled the documentation so he would be forced to stay in Russia. And you think that's proof that he's being treated differently than a normal American? Normal Americans don't get their passports canceled mid-flight.
Also, do you know how long it took Snowden to leave the airport? Let's be honest, of course you don't, but I do: 40 days. He lived in an airport for 40 days before he even got temporary asylum. That's definitely how you treat one of your valued spies, huh?
Anyway, this is a waste of my time. I can't keep listening to you make shit up and then desperately search for a cherry-picked, misinterpreted fact to justify it. Next time, just admit you're wrong, or at the very least, stop talking.
You asked me to share statements that Russia made that you mirrored. So I did.
Nice try changing the subject instead of acknowledging that you’re parroting Kremlin talking points.
Remember when he said he supported Kamala Harris when he was accused of election interference in the US?
You were done when you revealed that you don’t even know the meaning of espionage.
Your whole argument is: -“Snowden threw away his life because he is such a nice guy.”
-“Snowden chose flights that land in Russia but it’s Americas fault he’s there!”
-“How could Snowden possibly know that his passport would be cancelled after committing espionage and fleeing the country.”
You’ve been repeating Russian propaganda this whole time. I wanted to see if you would call Hong Kong China or repeat Chinese propaganda too.
Again, Chelsea Manning plead guilty to espionage (being a spy). You’re trying to reject reality and replace it with your revisionism.
“hOw CoUlD sNoWdEn KnOw HiS pAsSpOrT wOuLd Be CaNcElEd AfTeR cOmItTiNg EsPiOnAgE aNd FlEeInG tHe CoUnTrY?!”
Normal Americans don’t commit espionage and flee the country and then expect their passports to stay valid. This has to be the dumbest of all your arguments.
Like you couldn’t possibly forecast that a country would cancel a passport over espionage. I’m crying laughing at how stupid that is.
Lmao, you’re going with “spies can’t sleep in airports”! I bet you think dogs can’t look up also…