you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 46 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Our first data point is Monitors Unboxed. They found the Switch 2 returned an average pixel response time of 33 ms at 60 Hz.

Jesus Christ Nintendo. That's absolutely horrendous. But on the plus side I'm glad the screen undervolting let you improve the battery life to an impressive *checks notes* two hours!?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    all for the power of selling the device at profit and not at a loss.

    when currently last gen pc handheld like the lenovo legion go is being sold at 500$ and has both a higher fresh rate resolution and 20ms pixel response time conpared to the switch 2s 33ms.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So the display can't actually drive the pixels fast enough to exceed 30fps? Is that what that means?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I assume this means that at 60fps every frame will be delivered about 2 frames too late everytime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments