you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's also terrible compared to the first switch's screen though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Yeah it's not good, it's just a weird thing to put in the headline. It's like comparing a new hatchback with its competition, but then also say it's slower than the newest Ferrari. I think that should be a given as it's a fraction of the price

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Except other testers found it to be ~4ms faster than the switch 1, in tests where they actually give their methodology.

    Monitors unboxed just went "yeah it's 30+ms, source: trust me bro"

  • source
  • parent