this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
207 points (99.1% liked)

World News

48576 readers
2224 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said on Wednesday that she had spoken with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and that the two had agreed to strengthen trade collaboration, particularly in light of the tariffs from U.S. President Donald Trump set to go in effect on August 1.

"We both agreed that the (U.S.-Canada-Mexico) trade agreement needed to be respected, and we shared our experiences about the letter than we received from President Trump," Sheinbaum said in her daily morning press conference.

Trump has sent a flurry of letters in recent days, threatening to slap a range of tariffs on U.S. trade partners.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

There are agreements in place to facilitate the transit of goods via rail/truck through the USA, without onerous tariffs involved. Just like there are agreements in place to allow for transit of goods through Canada up to Alaska.

Could the fascists in the USA impact those trade routes? Sure. But they haven't yet, and there's been no explicit talk of it as far as I've seen at least. The most 'noise' on this front was caused, briefly, by the premier of BC saying they were going to tax trucks going to Alaska -- a threat they backed down from almost immediately, as they realised what it'd likely open the doors for in terms of Canada / Mexico trade routes.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Isn't it more economical to do mass transport by sea anyway? We can just go through international waters.

And all Canada's largest population centers are connected to the sea.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And all Canada's largest population centers are connected to the sea.

Calgary and Edmonton are large population centres, and they're hundreds of km from the sea, and the shortest route to the sea involves going over some enormous mountains.

Toronto is technically connected to the sea via the St. Lawrence, but you can't exactly park a container ship in the Toronto harbour. I mean, technically Minneapolis is connected to the sea via the Mississippi but there's a reason there's no big container port there.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You're right, I wasn't imagining Calgary and Edmonton to be this large but I just looked up and they are.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Shipping by rail is generally quicker, at a relatively low price point, and with far less ecological impact.

Shipping things like produce via sea to/from Mexico would likely result in a lot of spoiled food. Larger non-perishables it 'might' work, but you wouldn't bother if you have a cheap, less damaging and quicker option available.