this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
295 points (99.7% liked)

politics

24970 readers
2398 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The 2025 Medical Ethics Defense Act allows physicians to deny care to patients whose lifestyles they disagree with

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My point is the doctor shouldn't be prosecuted for taking a decision that the government is forcing them to take. The blame doesn't lie with the doctors but the government the people chose to make the laws.

This is what happens when the medical decision has to be guided by legal principles instead of medical reasonings.

Your anger understandable but directed at the wrong entity. It should be directed towards the government rather than the doctors. They might have been the face of decision taken to deny your wife care but it is not theirs.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are no laws regarding this specific situation. This is a stance they chose to take.

But believe me, I blame the doctors, the government, and Republican voters equally.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes but there is laws which prosecute doctors for abortion, which is a consequence of pregnancy.

Were they right to deny the investigation to your wife? No absolutely not.

Having said that, it is understandable why the blanket decision was taken.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, it's not understandable. There was no legal liability. The reason is misogyny.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

You can shift the blame all you want but the truth that this is the outcome people of Texas votes for won't change. Women being rejected necessary care for a healthy life.

The best consequences I can hope for is all the doctors move out of the state along with all the people who wish to have a healthy life.